Surprise! Donald Trump’s Supporters Don’t Believe His Newest Accusers Either

“Bullshit! Bullshit! Bullshit!”

Loren Elliott/Tampa Bay Times via ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


At a Thursday afternoon rally in West Palm Beach, an angry Donald Trump railed against the women who have accused him of sexual assault, promising that he would soon release evidence that would clear him of any wrongdoing and reveal the whole thing to be a sordid “conspiracy.” But even before the Republican nominee took the stage, many of the supporters who crowded into the hall at the South Florida Fairgrounds had already made up their minds: Donald didn’t do it. And besides, others rationalized, if he did it, it was a long time ago, and have you heard about Bill Clinton?

Trump backer Gloria Bachhus brought up the sexual assault allegations against Trump before I had a chance to ask her a question. “Oh, you’re a reporter? I’ve got something to tell you,” she said. “I’m in the aviation business. They said some stupid thing that Trump in 1981 was grabbing a woman, and she said that she was sitting in first class.” She grabbed my arm for emphasis. “Listen to me: She said that the [armrest] wasn’t down. Well, in first class they don’t have arms in the plane, in 1981. So she lied, okay? We know in the aviation business, first class does not have an arm! It has it in economy. You sit down and you separate from all the people on both sides. In first class you have your big seat and you don’t have an arm.” (Jessica Leeds, one of the women who has accused Trump of groping her, told the New York Times that Trump had lifted the arm rest and began touching her during a flight several decades ago.)

“They’re very weak, insincere,” another Trump supporter, Charles Wood, said of the GOP nominee’s accusers. “Probably not true.” When I asked why he thought they would make their stories up, his wife jumped in. “Money! And fame, attention.”

“I’m just so sick of all that,” Nancy King told me as she leaned against the steel dividers separating the press from the audience. “These women that 13 years later, all of a sudden, it’s just crazy. You know? To me, a person’s character, yes, that’s important, but the women’s character is just as bad. I mean just the fact that they would come out 13 years later and try to prove that. I see that as being opportunist.”

Maureen Salvo, an immigrant from the United Kingdom who told me “all the strong women” at her condo are voting for Trump, needed one word to sum up her feelings about the groping allegations. “Bullshit! Bullshit! Bullshit!” she said. “I think Clinton is corrupt, she’s getting scared now. They’re all coming up—I think she got them to say what she wants.” But even if the reports were true, that wouldn’t change Salvo’s preference. “He’s just a man,” she said. That’s what men do.

Like a number of voters, Nancy Severson from Wellington was suspicious of why allegations of Trump’s inappropriate conduct were just coming out now. “That’s a little late for that. I mean, I’m certainly not for men taking advantage of women or women taking advantage of men, but in this case, it seems like the timing is questionable—why it’s coming out now.” So who was behind it? “Oh, I definitely think it’s her campaign,” she said, referring to Hillary Clinton. “There’s a whole spin thing going on over there.”

Lisa Branden, a supporter from Royal Palm, Florida, who hoped that Trump might help her get better health insurance, told me, “I’m not worried about it.” Why not? “Look, they’re all against him—the media, the mainstream media, Washington—they’re all up against Trump, so they’re gonna throw everything they have at him. I told my husband that from the beginning. They’re gonna try to bring him down any way they can.”

“I don’t really care about his past indiscretions,” said Joe Paisano, a senior citizen in a Hawaiian shirt standing under a big American flag. “What I care about is what he’s going to do for the country, what he’s going to do for America, what he’s gonna do for us working guys, what he’s gonna do for the vets.”

While most Trump supporters expressed concerns about the media (more than a few held up signs calling CNN “Clinton News Network”), none were as fatalist as Ron Guziek, a bearded man in a “Daytona Bike Week” T-shirt. “It’s not going to have an effect,” he said of the sexual-assault allegations. “The Bilderbergers have already decided who’s going to win.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate