7 Awesomely Random Food Tips From the WikiLeaks Dump

John Podesta feels very strongly about the right way to make risotto.

Brendan Smialowski/DPA/ZUMA; gpointstudio/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Beginning last Friday, WikiLeaks has been releasing more leaked emails, this time from Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta. Among the tidbits reporters discovered was this shocking and highly controversial answer to Merrill Lynch financial advisor Peter Huffman’s earnest question on the evening of September 18, 2015:

Huffman: So I have been making a lot of risotto lately…and regardless of the recipe, I more/less adhere to every step you taught me. Question: why do I use a 1/4 or 1/2 a cup of stock at a time? Why can’t you just add 1 or 2 cups of stock at a time b/c the arborio rice will eventually absorb it anyway, right?

Podesta, who’s well-known for his culinary acumen, takes around 18 hours to respond. On September 19, he shoots back with:

Yes and no
Yes it [sic] with absorb the liquid, but no that’s not what you want to do. The slower add process and stirring causes the rice to give up it’s starch which gives the risotto it’s creamy consistency. You won’t get that if you dump all that liquid at once.

This widely-held assertion ruffled the feathers of MoJo CEO and European Victual Advisor Monika Bauerlein, who contends that pro risotto can easily be executed by dumping in all of the liquid at once. She’s not alone. As Food and Wine pointed out, respected cookbook author and chef J. Kenji López-Alt disagrees with Podesta’s claim.

Podesta might be one of the most powerful and influential figures in American politics right now. But López-Alt has science on his side. As he argues in his James Beard Award-winning magnum opus The Food Lab: Better Home Cooking Through Science, cooking the dish in a wide, shallow pan on low heat enables the rice to spread out and heat evenly in the broth. He explains in a post on his blog Serious Eats:

By cooking rice in a wide skillet like this, I found that I could get perfect results by adding the rice and almost all of the liquid at once, covering, and cooking over very low heat until the rice was done, stirring just once during the process.

That’s not the only shocker to come out of the WikiLeaks emails. Here’s a round-up of some more food-related revelations:

“For some inexplicable reason, my MRE contained PB and tortillas,” wrote Podesta’s son.
  • As Politico points out, a large number of Podesta’s personal emails come from grocery store chain Safeway, revealing that Podesta and his wife Mary are—gasp—card-carrying Club Card Members.
  • One set of emails shows Stonyfield Yogurt overlord Gary Hirshberg pushing Podesta to urge Hillary Clinton to support mandatory GMO labeling. Tom Philpott has the story here.
  • Philpott also dug up an exchange between Podesta and “mpodesta,” presumably his wife Mary. In November 2015, Podesta suggests inviting Mark Bittman to their Christmas party. Of the former New York Times columnist, author of a gazillion cookbooks, and Union of Concerned Scientists fellow, Mary responds: “I don’t know who that is.”
  • In Feburary 2014, the Podestas’ son, Air Force Captain Gabriel Podesta, reports back to the fam about a recipe inspired by his time in the service: “For some inexplicable reason, my MRE contained PB and tortillas. Attached please find a photo of my first ever Peanut Butter Taco.” Note to Gabe: Don’t search that term in Urban Dictionary.
  • At a campaign stop in Maumee, Ohio in April of 2015, Hillary’s Chipotle burrito bowl order included chicken and black beans, guacamole, and an iced tea. Writes Clinton’s press secretary Nick Merrill: “No one noticed she was there, which made for an awkward encounter between me and the manager as I was taking aerial shots of HRC ordering. I think he thought I was from the health department.” A Hillary staffer later called a New York Times article analyzing the candidate’s burrito bowl choice as a “new low.”
  • In one exchange, philanthropist Amrita Mahbubani describes in mouthwatering detail the dinner she and husband Ashok planned to cook for John Podesta and his brother Tony. The meal would include tandoori chicken, lamb, and fish roasted in an outdoor pizza oven; freshly baked garlic naan; a yogurt sauce; and a Basmati rice pilaff with peas, saffron, and pine nuts. Dessert included vanilla ice cream with fresh berries or mango, drizzled with Amaretto. Tony responds: “Happy to shop and chop.” Ashok offers that Amrita would do the shopping at Costco, “where she knows where to find what she wants”—adding ammunition to Tom Philpott’s long-held suspicion that rich people love Costco.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate