Three More States Approve Recreational Marijuana Use

Medical marijuana measures roll to victory as California, Massachusetts, and Nevada legalize it.

<a href="http://www.zumapress.com/srp.html?photographer2=c130">Libor Sojka/Zuma Press</a>

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Update, 2:00 p.m.: Voters in Arizona rejected Prop. 205, which would have legalized marijuana for recreational use, according to the Arizona Republic.  The Helena Independent Record reports Montana voters have approved their medical marijuana ballot measure. At 3:30 a.m. local time, the measure had 56 percent support. Maine’s legalization measure, Question 1, is still too close to call, though the Portland Press Herald reports “yes” has a slight lead with 96 percent of precincts reporting.

Update, 1:15 a.m.: ABC News projects Nevada voters will approve recreational marijuana. With 28 percent of precincts reporting, the measure, Question No. 2, had the support of 54 percent of voters.

Update, 11:55 p.m.: The Boston Globe reports Massachusetts will legalize marijuana. With 66 percent of the vote in, 53 percent are in support and 47 percent voted against. In Arkansas, voters have passed Issue 6, the medical marijuana ballot measure, according to KATV Little Rock.

Update, 11:30 p.m.: The Los Angeles Times reports California has approved recreational marijuana with Proposition 64 expected to pass. With 11 percent of precincts reporting, 54 percent supported the measure and 46 percent voted no. Additionally, the Bismark Tribune projects that North Dakota will approve its medical marijuana ballot proposal, Measure 5. With 75 percent of precincts reporting, 65 percent supported and 35 percent voted no.

Update, 8:45 p.m.: The Miami Herald reports that Florida voters passed Amendment 2, a medical marijuana ballot measure. With 70 percent of precincts reporting, 71 percent voted in favor, and 29 percent voted no.

It’s about to be lit.

With an unprecedented number of states holding votes on marijuana for recreational use or medical use, this Election Day could be a major turning point for pot. And now that almost two-thirds—60 percent—of the country supports legalizing marijuana for personal use, things are looking good for supporters of ballot initiatives seeking to broaden access to marijuana.

Tonight, we’ll learn if voters in California, Maine, Massachusetts, Nevada, and Arizona will vote to legalize marijuana for recreational use. Each measure would allow individuals at least 21 years old to carry and use an ounce or more of marijuana (in Maine you’d be able to carry 2.5 ounces). If the initiatives pass, about a quarter of the country will live where weed is legal. There are also four states voting on medical marijuana: Florida, North Dakota, Montana, and Arkansas.

But for pot proponents, all eyes will be on California. Arcview Market Research estimates sales to adult Californians could create a legal cannabis market of just under $6.5 billion, bringing, according to the California Legislative Analyst’s Office, up to a billion dollars in tax revenue. Polling suggests a win in the state, home to about 12 percent of Americans, is very likely, leaving proponents hopeful that the federal government will be forced to bring its policies in line with newly permissive state laws.

“Every time a state decides to roll back marijuana prohibition, it inspires members of Congress to take a closer look at the issue,” says Mason Tvert, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project. “Federal officials can see the direction in which the nation is headed on this issue, and most seem to recognize that marijuana prohibition is not going to last forever.”

Marijuana is still classified as a schedule I drug by the federal government, a category for substances considered to have a high potential for abuse and no medical use. That’s lead to perpetual tensions between federal drug law enforcement and local officials and cannabis businesses in places where marijuana is legal under local law. The classification has also been a roadblock for medical research, helping to prevent the kind of studies that might convince the federal government to change the drug’s scheduling.

We’ll be watching as results come in tonight and updating this post. Check back to see which states voted yes and no. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate