No, Checking In at the Standing Rock Pipeline Protests on Facebook Will Not “Confuse the Police”

It’s a waste of time.

A protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline in Standing Rock, North DakotaFibonacci Blue/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Two key flags in a viral Facebook post about the escalating oil pipeline protests at Standing Rock, North Dakota, indicate it is likely a hoax, according to Snopes

Meanwhile, my colleague Wes Enzinna, who has been reporting from the protests over the Dakota Access Pipeline, says there is scant evidence at the protest site that the story behind the post is true.

The bizarre Facebook post alleges that law enforcement officials at Standing Rock are using the Facebook “check-in” tool to keep track of people who are at the protests and to make arrests. Thousands of demonstrators, including members of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, are challenging the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Protesters say the project threatens the area’s water supply and destroys sacred Native American sites.

The post asked protest supporters on Facebook to use the social-media platform’s check-in tool at Standing Rock to say they were physically at the protest site, regardless of where they were actually located. This, the post claimed, would confuse law enforcement officials who were trying to track how many Facebook users were at Standing Rock. Plus, the check-ins were a show of solidarity that supporters could make from the comfort of their own computers. More than 100,000 people have checked in at the protests since Friday, according to Time.

Snopes writer Kim LaCapria said the post is probably a hoax. Snopes, which investigates viral claims in the news and on social media, designated the allegation that police at Standing Rock were tracking protesters via Facebook check-ins as “unproven.” This means Snopes couldn’t determine whether the claim was true or not.

Police officers are not using Facebook check-ins to track protesters, the sheriff’s department in Morton County, North Dakota, told my colleague Wes Enzinna, who has been reporting from Standing Rock.

It would be difficult to prove whether police were targeting people using Facebook check-ins, LaCapria told me. But there are two things in the post that make it less likely. First, it’s not logical. Even if police were tracking protesters on Facebook, it doesn’t make sense that more people checking-in as a response would help the situation.

“If that really was an issue—let’s say that people were getting arrested or taken into custody because of Facebook check-ins, then the obvious thing to do would be not check in,” LaCapria said. “It wouldn’t help as much to have people checking in as it would to have nobody checking in.”

Also, hoaxes are often one-sided, she said.

“Somebody will go on Facebook and tell a story that’s, like, 100 percent sympathetic. They’re so obviously the person you would side with,” LaCapria said.

The viral Standing Rock post fits that bill—but it also deviates from the kinds of rumors that normally go viral in a couple of ways, she added. “A lot of times when something goes viral on Facebook, it’s more objective—it’s something you can easily rate true or false. A thing happened or it didn’t happen. This is almost more of an editorial truth.”

An example of this are Facebook posts, created by people who oppose the Black Lives Matter movement, that claim that police officers or police supporters were refused service, LaCapria said.

After a grand jury decided not to indict the officers involved in Eric Garner’s death in December 2014, a story went viral that eight New York Police Department officers had been refused service at a Chipotle. What actually happened was that an employee had made a defiant “hands up” gesture and the officers decided to leave on their own accord.

“They’re not even necessarily really hoaxes. But a lot of times somebody will be involved in an interaction that they didn’t like, and they spin it up in their head as being targeted for being a police officer or wearing a police shirt or something…I haven’t seen one where it was actually an absolutely true one” LaCapria said.

The Standing Rock post “is like an inversion of it,” she added. In this case, a claim that is probably false was made against the police “but it’s very rare to see that.” And most stories that go viral among people who support the Black Lives Matter movement are based on incidents of police violence that actually happened, she added.

Enzinna, the Mother Jones senior editor, said that while there is chatter about alleged tracking via Facebook check-ins among protesters on the ground, he’s heard no firsthand accounts of arrests because of such activity.

“This [Facebook] check in tactic has been going on for over a week and I haven’t met anyone who experienced it firsthand,” he told me.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate