I’ve Interviewed Two Dozen Trump Voters in 6 Months. I’m Friending Them on Facebook.

An experiment to pop the bubble.

Can I pop my "filter bubble" by adding all these Trump voters to Facebook? Let's find out.James West/Mother Jones

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


We live on a Facebook island where a stream of news endlessly conforms to and reinforces our political views. That’s one theory, at least, behind why the US election results stunned half the country, stuck as we are in the social worlds of a segregated America, sustained by sometimes fact-free algorithms.

“American political discourse in 2016 seemed to be running on two self-contained, never-overlapping sets of information,” wrote Joshua Benton at Nieman Lab on Wednesday. The death of the news business and Facebook’s profit motive have combined, Benton argues, to make Facebook a “sewer of misinformation.” Here’s how he describes the so-called “filter bubble” in which we live:

Some of it is driven by ideology, but a lot is driven purely by the economic incentive structure Facebook has created: The fake stuff, when it connects with a Facebook user’s preconceived notions or sense of identity, spreads like wildfire…I’ve come to think that the rise of fake news—and of the cheap-to-run, ideologically driven aggregator sites that are only a few steps up from fake—has weaponized those filter bubbles.”

Facebook itself did some research into these filter bubbles and found its news-ranking algorithm did modestly reduce the diversity of political content for users—slightly more for liberals—but by far the most important factor in that exposure was who we’re friends with. Makes sense: The “composition of our social networks is the most important factor limiting the mix of content encountered in social media,” the company found in a 2015 report in the journal Science. “Liberals tend to be connected to fewer friends who share conservative content than conservatives (who tend to be linked to more friends who share liberal content).”

I have lots of journalist friends. Lots of Australian friends. And lots of politically liberal friends. And so my own social-media feeds have been packed with shock and outrage at the result of the election. That doesn’t surprise me: My conservative Facebook friends posted their outrage at Trump during the campaign, too. Connecting to Trump voters’ everyday thoughts and opinions via Facebook alone has basically been impossible.

And so, I’m embarking on an (unscientific) experiment. In a series of video reports over the last few months, I spoke with more than two dozen Trump supporters hailing from all over the country. I’m tracking them down again and asking: Can I friend you on Facebook?

Here’s everyone I spoke to in a handy 90-second video:

I’ve already had some luck. Tuffy Nicholas, a 60-year-old circus producer from Sarasota, Florida, was excited by the idea.

“Most of my friends thought he would win by a landslide like he did,” he told me on the phone, illustrating the divide. (I met Nicholas in Cleveland during the convention there, when he was selling Trump merchandise.) But Nicholas downplayed possible tensions between opposing groups of Americans. “I’m optimistic, and I’m hoping for the best. I’m very pleased that the president [Obama] and Trump had a good meeting, and everyone is aiming for a smooth transition.”

“Most of my friends thought he would win by a landslide like he did.”

Tim Graney, from Katy, Texas, spent election night cheering on Trump outside the Fox News studios in midtown Manhattan. I had met the 50-year-old Republican earlier that day. He was also impressed by what he sees as Trump’s desire to unite America.

“He was very positive and very complementary of Secretary Clinton…given the rhetoric and outlandish things both parties have said over the last year,” he told me later, back in Texas with a hoarse voice. “I think that’s setting a very positive tone for uniting the country.”

He also said Trump protesters are overreacting. In 2008, he said, “I was right there in the thongs of the tea party, and we felt just as disenfranchised and looked down upon.” Now, he says, it’s their turn.

Graney and I are now adding each other on Facebook.

I did run into an obstacle with Glenn Hessler, 52, from Erie, Pennsylvania. He’s not on Facebook. “They control the news and they’ve also been found guilty of suppressing speech,” he said. “So you’ve got another universe where free speech and speech in general is controlled by the powers that be behind the internet…It’s an extension of Big Brother.”

He was into the idea of staying in touch, however: “We are absolutely ready to reach out to the other side and explain things.”

I’ll keep contacting and adding Trump supporters as friends if they say yes, and I’ll report back as I go.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate