With Reproductive Rights Under Siege, Missouri Groups Seek to Block Abortion Restrictions

Two Planned Parenthood affiliates are hoping that a recent Supreme Court ruling can help strike down Missouri’s laws.

Jeff Malet/Newscom via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


With state legislatures poised to pass an onslaught of new abortion restrictions, reproductive rights advocates are gearing up for lengthy court battles in several states, especially those where Republicans will control all branches of government. One of those is Missouri, where local Planned Parenthood affiliates asked a federal judge this week to suspend two longstanding state abortion restrictions while a lawsuit challenging them works its way through the courts.

On Monday, Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region and Southwest Missouri asked US District Court Judge Howard Sachs to block one anti-abortion provision that requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at local hospitals and another that forces abortion clinics to meet the same structural requirements as ambulatory surgical centers. Passed in 2005, the restrictions—which are generally referred to as “targeted regulation of abortion providers” or TRAP laws—are similar to those struck down in Texas by the Supreme Court’s ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt earlier this year.

“My patients face an enormous amount of insurmountable challenges because of state laws that have never taken into consideration their health and safety,” Kristin Metcalf-Wilson, assistant vice president of Health Services at Planned Parenthood Great Plains, told reporters during a press call on Monday. “We are committed to taking this fight as far as we can.”

The Planned Parenthood affiliates are seeking a preliminary injunction that would temporarily end enforcement of the restrictions. The request comes weeks after the affiliates filed an official challenge in federal court, arguing that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Texas case justifies the reversal of similar laws in Missouri. Calling the hospital admitting privileges and ambulatory surgical center requirements “medically unnecessary” in a November statement announcing the challenge, the lawsuit also notes that the restrictions have forced several abortion providers in the state to close, leaving Missouri with one operating licensed health center offering abortions, a limitation that it says has required women to drive hundreds of miles to a clinic or attempt self-induced abortions.

If the injunction is successful, the Planned Parenthood affiliates hope to resume providing abortions at health centers in Columbia and Kansas City and plan to introduce abortion services at their locations in Joplin and Springfield.

Local advocates don’t expect a ruling on the law until the new year, but the request for an injunction comes during a period of heightened activity from both anti-abortion state legislatures and reproductive rights advocates. The suit arrives at a critical moment for Planned Parenthood, which is likely to face an intense fight over funding when the new, reinvigorated Republican Congress takes office in January. On Wednesday, the Obama administration issued a rule preventing state and local governments from withholding federal funds from Planned Parenthood and other health clinics that provide abortions alongside other family planning and contraceptive services, a move that may complicate legislative efforts to defund abortion providers. Anti-abortion advocates have promised to fight the rule, calling it “a poke in the eye to the now more vocal states that are pro-life and Republican.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate