Trump’s Newest Billionaire Appointee Made His Fortune With a Controversial Wall Street Tactic

Vinnie Viola, who made billions through high-frequency trading, is the nominee for secretary of the army.

Carl Juste/Miami Herald/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump has selected yet another billionaire to join the ranks of his administration by tapping Vinnie Viola to be his secretary of the army. The job is not a Cabinet position—he will serve under the secretary of defense, a role for which Trump has tapped retired Marines Gen. James Mattis—but does require Senate confirmation. That means Viola’s vast personal wealth will be picked apart. And that could get complicated. Unlike other Trump appointees who made their billions in blockbuster deals, Viola earned his estimated $2.2 billion through lots and lots of very fast deals.

Viola attended West Point and joined the Army in 1977. He became an Army Ranger, jumping out of planes with the 101st Airborne. But he didn’t stay long in the military, leaving in the 1980s to join Wall Street.

It wasn’t until 2008 that Viola truly hit it big with the creation of Virtu Financial. The firm has since become one of the top 10 high-frequency trading firms—a form of trading that uses complicated algorithms, superfast computers, and artificial intelligence to make financial trades in mere fractions of a second. So before a person—or even a sophisticated trader—can learn of good or bad news and decide to buy or sell a stock, Virtu Financial has already bought or sold. It’s a complicated and controversial tactic; Michael Lewis detailed the downsides in his 2014 book Flash Boys. Critics of the methods used by Viola and other high-frequency traders contend that it allows these firms to front-run everyone else in the market, dulling the chances for others to make successful trades.

Whether its practices are fair or not, Virtu is extraordinarily successful. A Bloomberg profile of the firm reported that between 2009 to 2014, the firm lost money on only one day. Put another way, Viola and Virtu don’t win every time, just 99.94 percent of the time.

Thanks largely to Lewis’ book, which featured Virtu, the firm was the subject of a probe launched in 2014 by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman and a class-action lawsuit filed by the city of Providence and major pension funds. The suit accused Virtu and other high-frequency trading firms of taking unfair advantage of the rest of the market. It was eventually tossed out, and there have no been public signs that Schneiderman’s probe remains active. His office did not return a request for comment.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate