GOP Congresswoman Slams Trumpcare, Says It Could “Severely Harm” People’s Health

“My constituents should not have to take a step backward in their ability to obtain treatment for any illness.”


House Republicans are racing to hold a vote on legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare, but some members of their party still aren’t convinced. One of them, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), released a blistering statement Thursday, warning that the bill could “severely harm the health” of her constituents.

Ros-Lehtinen is one of about 20 House Republicans who came out against the latest iteration of the GOP bill, known as the American Health Care Act, over the past week. Among their concerns: The proposal would slash Medicaid funding and allow states to opt out of a popular Obamacare provision barring insurers from charging more for patients with preexisting medical conditions.

On Wednesday, Republicans drafted an amendment that would provide some additional funding to help people with preexisting conditions who might otherwise be priced out of coverage under the GOP bill. That amendment seems to have won over some of the wavering Republicans—but not Ros-Lehtinen. “Despite amendment, the AHCA still fails to provide for the needs of my constituents,” Lehtinen said in her statement. “I will not support a bill that has the potential to severely harm the health and lives of people in South Florida, and therefore I remain steadfast in my commitment to vote NO on the AHCA.”

She continued by saying the plan would hurt the older and poorer residents living in her district. “If enacted, the older and poorer South Floridians will be worse off and will find it more difficult to obtain quality health care.”

Lehtinen’s harsh words come just days after she announced she would not seek another term. She struck a bipartisan tone in a press conference Monday announcing her upcoming retirement from Congress, saying that while she is a proud Republican, she believes “good ideas comes from Democrats” as well.

The vote, which was announced late Wednesday, will be the GOP’s second attempt to pass its replacement plan. Party leaders pulled an earlier version of the legislation from the floor in March when it became clear they did not have enough support.

Democratic lawmakers and a handful of Republicans have slammed House leaders for trying to rush through the bill. There have been no public hearings on the latest version of the legislation, and the Congressional Budget Office has not been given a chance to issue projections about how much the legislation will cost, how many people will lose their insurance, or what will happen to the price of coverage. (The CBO estimated that under an earlier version of the bill, 24 million fewer people would be insured.)

As of Thursday morning, confusion abounded over what exactly was in the legislation.

The head-spinning effort to pass the bill comes eight years after Republicans decried what they viewed as insufficient time to review Obamacare before that legislation went to a vote. Here’s a 2009 clip of Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.), now the speaker of the House, opposing President Barack Obama’s signature health care law:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate