This Senator Just Blasted His GOP Colleagues for Ignoring the Opioid Epidemic

”If this becomes law, there is no Narcan for Medicaid. Once it’s cut by Trumpcare, it is dead.”

Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) took to the Senate floor Monday night to blast his Republican colleagues for attempting to pass a health care bill that, amid a spiraling nationwide opioid epidemic, could eliminate insurance coverage for thousands of Americans that depend on it for addiction treatment. Markey pointed to the GOP’s efforts to cut Medicaid funding as particularly harmful for individuals dealing with an opioid addiction (the House’s health care bill included $834 billion in reductions to Medicaid spending).

“If this becomes law, there is no Narcan for Medicaid,” Markey said, referring to the brand name for naloxone, the overdose reversal medication. “Once it’s cut by Trumpcare, it is dead. Those devastating cuts would grind the progress we’ve made in expanding access to opioid treatment to a screeching halt and kick people currently in treatment to the curb.”

Senate Republicans are working on their bill to repeal Obamacare behind closed doors, so the details of how it would effect drug users in recovery are unknown. But an estimated 2.8 million Americans with a substance abuse disorder, including 220,000 who are addicted to opioids, would lose some or all of their insurance coverage if Obamacare is repealed, according to an analysis by researchers Richard Frank of Harvard Medical School and Sherry Glied of New York University. The Congressional Budget Office found that if a version of Trumpcare that passed the House last month became law, addiction treatment services “could increase by thousands of dollars in a given year” for those who aren’t covered by insurance through their employers.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate