Trump’s FBI Nominee Just Ensured Confirmation—By Repeatedly Disagreeing With Trump

Christopher Wray says he doesn’t subscribe to the president’s views on torture, Islam, and the Russia investigation.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom via ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Christopher Wray, President Donald Trump’s pick to head the FBI, earned support from members of the Senate Judiciary Committee in both parties Tuesday, in part by disagreeing with Trump at almost every chance he got. Several committee Democrats, including the panel’s ranking member, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), announced they would vote to confirm Wray, likely assuring that he will become the agency’s new director.

Trump sparked a political firestorm in May when he dismissed the previous FBI director, James Comey, who at the time was leading the investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and possible coordination between Trump associates and the Kremlin. According to Comey, Trump at one point requested that Comey pledge loyalty to the president—a request Comey refused. Trump has disputed that account.

Wray told the committee he would have answered the same way. “No one asked me for any kind of loyalty oath, and I sure as heck didn’t offer one,” he said. “My loyalty is to Constitution, the rule of law, and to the mission of the FBI.”

That wasn’t the only time Wray staked out a position that was seemingly at odds with Trump.

The White House has claimed Trump has the right to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who took over the Justice Department’s Russia investigation after Comey’s firing. Wray said he wasn’t sure of the law surrounding the president’s power to dismiss the special prosecutor, but he told senators that as long as the agency’s legal advisers okayed it, he would report any attempt by the White House to interfere in Mueller’s probe.

“I would consider an effort to tamper with Director Mueller’s investigation to be unacceptable and inappropriate and would need to be dealt with very sternly and appropriately indeed,” Wray said.

Questioned by Sen. Al Franken, (D-Minn.), Wray  rejected two of Trump’s assertions about Comey, who Wray worked with at the Justice Department under President George W. Bush. Franken asked if Comey, lost the confidence of rank-and-file FBI agents and hurt morale within the bureau, as White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders has claimed

Wray suggested Comey had not. “All the people I’ve spoken with, ” he said, “from senior people to rank-and-file people…are mission focused” and “charging ahead.”

Franken also asked about Trump’s reported description of Comey as a “nut job.

“That has never been my experience with him,” Wray said.

Some of Wray’s most pointed disagreements with Trump came under questioning by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).

Trump has called the investigation into whether his campaign coordinated with the Kremlin “a witch hunt.” Graham asked Wray if he agreed.

“I do not consider Director Mueller to be on a witch hunt,” Wray said.

In the wake of news that Donald Trump Jr. organized a meeting of Trump campaign officials in June 2016 with a Russian lawyer he hoped would transmit damaging information on Hillary Clinton provided by the Russian government, the president issued a statement stating his son is “a high-quality person and I applaud his transparency.” 

Wray did not endorse that statement. At Graham’s behest, he said a person in a situation like Trump Jr.’s should contact a lawyer and federal authorities.

“Any threat or offer to interfere in our election from any national state or any nonstate actor is the kind of the thing the FBI would want to know about,” he said.

Trump has not fully accepted the US Intelligence Community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help secure his election, and he agreed in a meeting last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin to “move forward” on relations after Putin denied that Russia meddled. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed Trump told Putin there is “no proof” that the Kremlin oversaw the hacking of Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign emails.

Wray said he had “no reason to doubt” the intelligence agencies’ findings. He said “an effort to interfere with our election is an adversarial act.

During his presidential campaign, Trump said he would bring back waterboarding and “a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding.” Trump has insisted that torture “works.”

Pressed by Feinstein, Wray flatly disputed Trump’s claim. “Torture is wrong,” Wray said. “It’s unacceptable. It’s illegal, and I think it’s ineffective.”

As a candidate, Trump advocated a ban on Muslims entering the United States, which he has pushed in a modified form as president. As a candidate he routinely linked Islam to violence and declared that “Islam hates us.” Trump has also suggested that Muslims do not do enough to report terrorists in their communities.

Wray on Wednesday emphasized the difference between patriotic Muslim Americans and terrorists. “Some of the best leads we ever got came from members of that community,” he said of his experience as a federal prosecutor. Wray referred to people with a “radical ideology,” avoiding the link between terrorism and Islam that Trump proudly draws when he uses the phrase “radical Islamic terror.”

Wray told committee members he would quit his post rather than accept instructions from Trump that he considered illegal or unethical.

“I would try to talk him out of it,” he said. “And if that failed, I would resign.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate