I Caught the Russian Ambassador As He Left His Farewell Party. It Was Super Weird.

Turns out, a lot of people do remember meeting Sergey Kislyak.

Susan Walsh/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

At the bar in Washington’s posh St. Regis Hotel Tuesday night, tourists watched CNN pundits opine on the bombshell revelations that Donald Trump Jr. tried to conspire with Russians in a bid to help his father in the 2016 presidential election.

Many were unaware that in a ballroom a hundred or so feet away, a central figure in the ongoing Russia interference scandal was holding court. After nearly a decade in D.C., it was time for the ubiquitous, outgoing Russian Ambassador Sergey Kisylak, whose once-secret meetings and communications with former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and Attorney General Jeff Sessions rocked the Trump administration and helped fuel suspicions of Kremlin meddling in US politics, to say goodbye. 

Journalists were barred from the closed-door farewell reception hosted by the US-Russia Business Council. Several attendees, though, described what outsiders might consider a strangely serene and low-key send-off, at which business people and policy wonks mingled, snacked, and remembered the softer side of a man accused of overseeing Russian espionage efforts over nine years as Moscow’s man in D.C. There was little reference, they said, to the swirling collusion controversy that has left relations between the countries at their worst since the Cold War, not to mention the big news of the day about Donald Trump Jr. 

“To me, he is Father Claus. He is Santa Claus,” said Natalia Kalishman, a Florida-based immigration lawyer born in the former Soviet Union, said of Kislyak, who is often described as genial and shares St. Nick’s portly build. “He really has a weak spot for his grandchildren. But he’s tough and he says it as it is.”

“I talked to him briefly to wish him well,” said Paul Saunders, executive director of the Center for the National Interest, a think tank that hosted a speech last year in which Donald Trump met Kislyak and outlined his  “America First” doctrine. (Saunders’ organization has disputed assertions that it has overly-close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, claims which he said reflect “a 1950s era climate” with “people looking for a lot of things that aren’t there.”)

Guests at the reception said accusations that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election came up only indirectly, as, in his remarks, Kislyak emphasized that relations between the two countries are cyclical.

“The barometer goes up and down, up and down,” Kalishman summarized. “Differences can always be overcome.” 

“Business, cultural relations don’t depend on international relations,” said her husband, Steve Kalishman, who works with Sister Cities International*, which partners US and Russian cities, as well as those in other countries, also outlining Kislyak’s message. “We’re focused on people to people, business to business, school to school.”

Mother Jones caught Kislyak as he exited the St. Regis, accompanied by a few well-wishers but no evident security. Asked to assess his tenure, the ambassador called it “interesting.”

“It could have been more interesting,” he added when pressed on whether he regretted the recent downturn in relations. 

It was not clear exactly what he meant. But Kislyak left the confusion hanging, climbed in the idling car, and departed.

*Correction: The original version of the article said Steve Kalishman works for Sister Cities International. Kalishman is a member of the group’s board, but not a paid employee.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate