Is Jeff Sessions a “Zombie Attorney General”?

He’d rather talk about cybercrime.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein during a press conference July 20.Andrew Harnik/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions and other top Justice Department officials hosted a press conference Thursday to announce an international operation that took down two of the world’s largest dark-web internet marketplaces. But when the officials took questions, reporters turned to the political elephant in the room: whether Sessions will keep his job after President Donald Trump slammed him in a New York Times interview.

“This is not really a normal day,” one of the reporters told Sessions, as she began her question. “The president made very disparaging remarks about you, attorney general of the United States, [and the] deputy attorney general yesterday. Given what he said, what is your reaction to those remarks [and] how seriously are you considering possibly resigning?” 

“We in this department will continue every single day to work hard to serve the national interest,” Sessions said, noting that Trump sets the priorities and Sessions works to carry them out. He added, “We love this job. We love this department. I plan to continue to do so as long as that is appropriate.” He then tried to focus attention on the marketplace takedown. 

Sessions and his colleagues set out to announce that on July 5, the Justice Department, the FBI, and the Drug Enforcement Agency, working with counterparts in a half-dozen countries around the world, busted AlphaBay, a large online marketplace, accessible only through an anonymizing web browser, which sold everything from drugs to stolen credit card data to illicit computer software. Law enforcement officials estimate that AlphaBay facilitated at least $1 billion in transactions since its creation in 2014. After it was shut down, many of the site’s users tried to go over to Hansa, another dark-web marketplace. Authorities closed that site shortly before the press conference, according to a statement issued by Europol.    

The reporters at Thursday’s announcement, though, didn’t ask about these operations. Instead, the focus was on the bombshell New York Times interview with the president on Wednesday, in which he said he would have never appointed Sessions as attorney general had he known Sessions would then recuse himself from investigations into Russian meddling in the 2016 election. Trump also slammed Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for appointing former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel to investigate any Russian intervention and possible connections with Trump associates. “How do you take a job and then recuse yourself?” Trump complained about Sessions. “If he would have recused himself before the job, I would have said, ‘Thanks, Jeff, but I’m not going to take you.’ It’s extremely unfair—and that’s a mild word—to the president.” 

A reporter asked Sessions on Thursday how he can serve effectively if he doesn’t have the confidence of the president. “We are serving right now,” Sessions replied. 

Another reporter asked Rosenstein, who was also at the press conference, about Trump’s comments. “We are working every day to advance the priorities of the Department of Justice,” Rosenstein replied. “Proud to be here yesterday, proud to be here today, proud to work tomorrow.” 

A final question was shouted to Sessions, as the officials began to leave the room: “Are you concerned that you will be seen as a zombie attorney general?” 

Sessions did not respond.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate