Report: Queasy Aussies Killed Trump’s Casino Bid Over “Mafia Connections”

Government documents label Trump’s Atlantic City operations “dangerous.”

Donald Trump in front of the Sydney Opera House in September, 2011.James D. Morgan/Rex Features/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Australian authorities simply couldn’t stomach Donald Trump’s alleged mob ties, according to government documents published by Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper,Ā The Australian, on Tuesday. The paper’s investigation reveals that Trump’s dream of building a casino in Sydney in the late 1980s was killed off by queasy officials who consideredĀ his operations in New Jersey “dangerous.”

In 1987, Trump had already opened two casinos in Atlantic City, New Jerseyā€”Trumpā€™s Castle and Trump Plazaā€”with Trump Taj Mahal on its way.Ā He was looking to expand the empire Down Under by bidding for a spot on Sydney’s picturesque harbor in partnership with a local developer, theĀ Kern Corporation.

When the state government officials met that May to considerĀ proposals for the site, they were presented with a police report that was unambivalent in opposing the plan for a one clear reason. “Atlantic City would be a dubious model for Sydney and in our judgment,” police noted, according to a summary contained in government minutes. “The Trump Mafia connections should exclude the Kern/Trump consortium.”Ā 

Also included in the documents published byĀ The Australian is aĀ finĀ­ancial report concluding Trumpā€™s partnership had overstated estimated revenue from the Ā­casino.

Trump’s comments about the Sydney casinoĀ at the time foreshadow his bellicosity as president. FromĀ The Australian:

Mr Trump boasted about his bid for the casino before cabinet reached its decision. ā€œIf our design is chosen, it will not only be the largest, but one of the most magnificent, one of the most beautiful hotels anywhere in the world,ā€ he toldĀ The AustralianĀ in February 1987. A month before the cabinet decision, he pulled out of the casĀ­ino race but three days later announced he was still a contender.

The damning assessment by Australian officials looking into Trump’s Sydney casino bid in 1987.Ā 

The Australian

It turns out Sydney dodged a bullet. Just a year later, Trump was trying to convince New Jersey officials he had theĀ financial wherewithal to open Trump Taj Mahal, according to January 2016Ā Mother Jones reporting onĀ his Atlantic City bankruptcies:Ā 

At a hearing in 1988, Trump assured regulators that his reputation would secure him the necessary financing. In particular, he said he could get loans at prime ratesā€”the interest rate that commercial banks offer their most trusted customersā€”rather than so-called ā€œjunk bonds.ā€

ā€œI can use my own funds or I can use regular bank borrowings, so I can build at the prime rate,ā€Ā Trump said, according toĀ transcripts obtained by theĀ Post. ā€œI mean, the banks call me all the time. ā€˜Can we loan you money? Can we do this? Can we do that?ā€™”

Trump continued with a line that could be straight out of one of his campaign speeches: ā€œI get it done, and everybody is happy, and it turns out successfully.ā€

But he did not get it done, andĀ everybody was not happy. WhileĀ theĀ regulators approved Trumpā€™s casino license,Ā the promised prime-rate loans never materialized, and Trump turned to the very junk bonds he had disparaged.Ā ā€œHe agreed to pay the bond lenders 14 percent interest, roughly 50 percent more than he projected, to raise $675 million. It was the biggest gamble of his career,ā€Ā PostĀ reporter Robert Oā€™Harrow Jr. wrote.

It was a gamble that failed: The Taj Mahal project ultimately filed for bankruptcy, screwing workers out of millions in retirement savings in the process.

The new reporting adds a new detail to exhaustiveĀ reporting by my colleague David Corn before the 2016 election, in which he details Trump’s known connections to mob associates and organized crime:

For years during his business career, Trump worked or associated with proven or alleged mobsters. (Trumpā€™sĀ longtime lawyer, the thuggish and deceased Roy Cohn, repped numerous Mafia bosses, some of whom were connected to Trump projects.) Yet when asked about his links to the mob, Trump has repeatedly made false comments and has contradicted himselfā€”to such a degree it seems he has flat-out lied about these relationships, even when he was under oath.

In a follow-up article,Ā The Australian reports that Trump began airing doubts about the Sydney casino deal around the time the damning police report was finalized, abruptlyĀ canceling a trip to Australia.Ā ā€œI donā€™t know whether my enthusiasm level can be very great for that particular job,” he said at the time, bemoaning the long flight from America. “Itā€™s just a long, long trip away. I believe [in]Ā very hands-on management.ā€™ā€™

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate