Jeff Sessions Vows He’ll Go After Bad Cops. His Policies Suggest Otherwise.

The attorney general spoke to black law enforcement leaders on Tuesday.

Attorney General Sessions at the DOJ's National Summit on Crime Reduction and Public Safety in June.Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In a speech Tuesday, in Atlanta, Attorney General Jeff Sessions assured black law enforcement officials that the Justice Department would work to hold officers accountable for abuse and misconduct. Sessions noted that “only 30 percent of African Americans say that they have confidence in police,” referring to a recent Gallup poll. “That means African Americans have the least trust in police of any group in the United States.” He added: “We all know the cases of the last several years where, in confrontations with police, lives have been cut short. Just as I am committed to defending law enforcement who use deadly force while lawfully engaged in their work, I will also hold any officer responsible breaking the law. You and I know that all it takes is one bad officer to destroy the reputations of so many who work day in and day out to build relationships in these communities and serve with honor and distinction.”

But Sessions’ remarks at the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives’ annual conference in Atlanta stand in contrast with steps he’s taken as attorney general to roll back federal oversight of local police departments. In April, he ordered a review of all reform agreements reached between the Justice Department and local and state police departments—often the result of problems with excessive use of force—noting in a memo to DOJ staff that “it is not the responsibility of the federal government to manage non-federal law enforcement agencies.” Days later, DOJ attorneys attempted to block a consent decree negotiated between the Obama administration and the Baltimore Police Department, though a federal judge approved the agreement. The DOJ also declined earlier this year to seek federal charges against officers who killed Alton Sterling in Louisiana in 2016, and John Crawford in Ohio in 2014, though police experts note that it’s difficult to prove wrongdoing in such cases and that charges were rare even during the Obama administration.

In July, Sessions announced that federal law enforcement would expand the use of civil asset forfeiture, a practice whereby police seize property and cash from individuals if they believe those assets to be connected to illegal activity; civil rights advocates warn that policy could encourage corruption and abuse among police. 

Police departments around the country have distanced themselves in recent days from remarks President Trump made to police officers in Long Island in which he appeared to encourage officers to use excessive force against people they arrested, praising them for being “rough” with suspects. On Monday, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said during the daily press briefing that she believed Trump was “joking” when he made the remarks. Sessions made no mention of Trump’s remarks during his speech on Tuesday. 

This year’s NOBLE conference came against a starkly different political backdrop. Last July when it was held in Washington, DC, then Attorney General Loretta Lynch delivered a speech just a day after three officers were killed in an ambush-style attack in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, by a gunman who was upset about police killings of black men. Lynch addressed the unique experience of being black and a police officer; she also spoke to the importance of efforts by the Obama administration to improve federal oversight of law enforcement nationwide. Lynch gave the speech while introducing her predecessor, Eric Holder, who served as the nation’s first black attorney general and received an award from the organization for his civil rights work as America’s top law enforcement official.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate