Trump Declines to Declare a State-of-Emergency to Fight the Opioid Epidemic

Nevermind that was the core recommendation from the president’s own commission.

President Donald Trump at a meeting on the opioid crisis, with Presidential Counselor Kellyanne Conway, Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price, Trump, and First Lady Melania Trump. Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Trump administration declined to declare a national state of emergency to fight the opioid epidemic Tuesday afternoon at a much-anticipated press briefing in Bedminster, New Jersey—despite that step being the “first and most urgent recommendation” of the president’s own commission.

The interim report from the Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis was published last week and advocates for an emergency declaration as a way to “empower” Trump’s “cabinet to take bold steps” and “force Congress to focus on funding and empowering the Executive Branch,” all while unleashing millions of dollars in federal funding. Some states—including Florida, Maryland, and Arizona—have already declared states of emergency.

At his private New Jersey golf club, Trump attended a meeting with the first lady, presidential counselor Kellyanne Conway, Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price, and other officials. “The best way to prevent drug addiction and overdose,” Trump said, “is to prevent people from abusing drugs in the first place.” He continued, “If they don’t start, they wont have a problem. If they do start, it’s awfully tough to get off. So if we can keep them from going on and maybe by talking to youth and telling them, ‘No good, really bad for you in every way.’ But if they don’t start, it will never be a problem.”

Afterward, Conway and Sec. Price took questions from reporters. When asked if President Trump would declare a state of emergency, Price said the president is treating the crisis “as an emergency, and it is an emergency.” But he stopped short of actually declaring a state of emergency: “We believe that the resources that we need to bring to bear on the opioid crisis at this point can be addressed without the declaration of the emergency. Though all things are on the table,” he said, leaving, at least in theory, the door open for such a move in the future. 

An emergency designation for the opioid crisis is broadly supported by public health experts, who argue more money is necessary to tackle an epidemic that killed more than 30,000 Americans in 2015. Just this morning, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published new provisional data that shows the number of deaths caused by drug overdose is continuing to increase

Crude death rates for drug overdose in the United States from 2015 through “Quarter 3” of 2016.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The failure to declare a state of emergency today is just one more example of the administration’s shortcomings on addressing the opioid crisis. Had Republicans been successful in repealing the Affordable Care Act and passing new health care legislation, addiction services for millions would have been eliminated and Medicaid would have been cut by billions of dollars, devastating rural areas where President Trump finds much of his support. Meanwhile, Sec. Price degraded the use of opioid addiction medications as “replacing one opioid with another” and Attorney General Jeff Sessions has also taken a hard-line approach towards drug use reminiscent of the war on drugs.

The briefing from Conway and Price came within hours of President Trump’s incendiary remarks about North Korea, warning that if its threats of nuclear warfare continue, the country will be “met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate