Ed Gillespie Just Gave a Speech to the NAACP. It Sounded Nothing Like His Real Campaign.

The Virginia Republican’s ads have been all about MS-13 and Confederate statues.

Ed Gillespie

Steve Helber/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Something was missing when Ed Gillespie spoke to members of the Virginia NAACP Saturday in Richmond. Gillespie, the Republican candidate for governor, talked about education and jobs and the “school-to-prison pipeline.” He talked about second-chances for convicted felons and sentencing reform. He emphasized how eager he was to work with black leaders if elected—and how hard he had worked to rearrange his schedule to be at an event he had not originally been scheduled to attend. He sounded like the Republican reformer the Richmond Times-Dispatch had effusively endorsed one day earlier with the tough-but-fair pull-quote: “In an era of screamers, Gillespie speaks in calm tones.”

What was missing Saturday was the campaign Gillespie is actually running. Gillespie spoke and answered questions for 25 minutes, but in that time he never once mentioned the gang MS-13, the subject of an ad campaign that has been running seemingly on loop in Virginia for two months. In the ads and accompanying mailers, Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, the Democratic nominee, is accused (falsely) of backing sanctuary cities, and therefore, of enabling violent crimes by scary Latino gang members. One representative ad featured a group of tattooed Salvadorans over the text “Kill. Rape. Control.” Perhaps giving away the game, the Central American men featured in that anti-MS-13 spot were not members of MS-13, and the photo came from a prison in El Salvador. Virginia’s big, but it’s not that big.

Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D), who addressed the room a few minutes before Gillespie, has derided the ads as “racist” and “bigoted,” and Northam came out Friday with his own ad denouncing them. The NAACP conference offered a natural opportunity for Gillespie to defend himself on the racial wedge-issue at the center of his campaign. He passed.

Likewise, Gillespie avoided any discussion of restoration of felon voting rights at an organization that has been one of the leading champions voices on the issue. He’s not so quiet elsewhere. In a new spot last week, Gillespie attacked Northam over the re-enfranchisement of 150,000 ex-felons, tying the lieutenant governor to the case of a child pornographer. “Ralph Northam’s policy of automatic restoration of rights for unrepentant, unreformed, violent criminals is wrong,” Gillespie says in the ad.

As part of his kinder, gentler pitch, Gillespie told his audience Saturday that “it is a legitimate concern to have a criminal charge or conviction dog you for the rest of your life” (in response to a question about marijuana sentencing), but again he steered clear of his campaign’s new talking point.

One subject, though, couldn’t be avoided—Charlottesville. Gillespie, as he has done previously, unequivocally denounced the tiki-torch mob whose August rally ended in the killing of a counter-protester:

GILLESPIE: What we saw in August was horrific. And I’ve talked about this a number of times, but I wanted to share my thoughts about it. Take a couple points: First of all, I do think it’s important to note that 90 percent, according to news accounts, 90 percent of those white supremacists, KKK, Neo-Nazis, who were in Charlottesville came from outside out commonwealth. They were in Virginia. But they were not of Virginia.

Secondly, they are not on any legitimate political spectrum of left to right. Let’s be clear about that. These people are not out there because they think we should have more choice in our children’s education or lower taxes versus higher taxes. These are people who have a twisted mindset rooted in hate who want to oppress certain people. And when you have as a core believe that one race is superior to another or that adherents to another religion are inferior to you, that’s worse than immoral. That is dehumanizing. And that makes it a presence of evil in our world, and we must confront it and reject it at every turn. And that’s, when I saw what happened in Charlottesville and the impact it had on all of us—some had a more deeply felt impact than others—but I can tell you that what I saw there made me want to vomit.

A good clean riff. Except that the alt-right does have clear political preferences. They backed Donald Trump for president, and in Virginia, they support the preservation of Confederate monuments—the issue that brought them to Charlottesville in the first place. Gillespie, who also backed Trump, also wants those monuments to stay up, and he’s now attacking Northam for arguing otherwise. In Gillespie’s newest digital ad about the statues—the second this month—a narrator refers to the monuments as “our” statues, the same word used by Trump. Although he was speaking just a few miles away from Richmond’s Monument Avenue, the epicenter of the statue fight, the subject didn’t come up.

Gillespie was the only member of the Republican ticket to appear at the NAACP conference. (As it happened, the party’s nominee for lieutenant governor, Jill Vogel, couldn’t make it because she was at a fundraiser for Corey Stewart, the state’s leading Confederate monument activist, at a plantation house. Stewart, who narrowly lost to Gillespie in the primary, is now running for US Senate.)

But lest there be any confusion about what the 2017 election was really being fought over, the Democratic ticket that followed Gillespie to the dais was happy to offer a refresher. “If you walk out this hall and see the TV monitor in the lobby and Ed Gillespie comes on, guess what he’s talking about,” said Justin Fairfax, the party’s lieutenant governor nominee. “Gangs and MS-13 and fear-mongering and race-baiting and sanctuary cities.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate