October 26, 2017

House Democrats Demand Answers From the Trump Campaign’s Data Firms

The CEO of one firm, Cambridge Analytica, reportedly offered to team up with Wikileaks to find Clinton’s emails.

Shawn Thew/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The top Democrats on the House judiciary and oversight committees have sent a letter to several data analytics companies, including Cambridge Analytica, seeking answers about their involvement in Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

Cambridge Analytica, which White House senior adviser Jared Kushner has credited with helping secure Trump’s White House victory, has come under increasing scrutiny in connection with ongoing probes into possible collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. This week, the Daily Beast reported that the firm’s CEO Alexander Nix personally reached out to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange last year with an offer to help track down a trove of Hillary Clinton’s missing emails. Assange, who declined the offer, confirmed to the Daily Beast that Nix had sent an email with the proposal. 

The firm, where ex-White House strategist Stephen Bannon once served as a vice president, is partly owned by hedge fund mogul and top Trump backer Robert Mercer. The letter on Thursday was also sent to four other companies, including Giles-Parscale. On Tuesday, the House intelligence committee interviewed that company’s co-founder, Brad Parscale, about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

“The prospect that any American company may have aided a foreign government, worked with hostile foreign actors, or benefitted from unlawfully accessed information is concerning and could impact the consideration of ongoing legislation,” the letter, signed by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), reads. “Accordingly, we ask that you provide information and documents in response to the following questions.”

The Trump campaign has since attempted to downplay its work with the company, which it reportedly paid $5.9 million, making it its top vendor. “Leading into the election, the RNC had invested in the most sophisticated data-targeting program in modern American history, which helped secure our victory in the fall,” Trump campaign director Michael Glassner said in a statement Wednesday. “We were proud to have worked with the RNC and its data experts and relied on them as our main source for data analytics.”

Read the full letter here:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate