Justice Department Has Communicated With Controversial Election Commission, Sessions Confirms

The revelation fuels concerns over voter suppression efforts and could raise legal questions.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Oct. 18, 2017. Carolyn Kaster/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions confirmed Wednesday that there have been communications between the Justice Department and President Donald Trump’s controversial election fraud commission, amplifying concerns that the two bodies may be working together to make it harder for Americans to vote.

The actions and records of the election commission so far have confirmed fears among voting rights advocates that the commissions’ leaders are determined to compile evidence of voter fraud—of which there have been few documented cases—with the likely goal of imposing tighter restrictions on registering and voting. The commission’s communications, revealed earlier this month as part of a lawsuit, have raised concerns that it is not acting alone in its work. Voting rights advocates became concerned that the Justice Department and the commission were coordinating in June, when on the same day that the commission requested data from states on every registered voter, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division asked states to turn over information on how they maintain their voting rolls.

Communication between the Justice Department and the commission may also raise legal questions if the department is sharing data with the commission that is protected by privacy laws. The Justice Department is also restricted by a policy written by the White House counsel in January that prevents it from sharing certain information about ongoing investigations and prosecutions with the White House.

Sessions appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee for a Justice Department oversight hearing on Wednesday. Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) asked him whether anyone working for him was coordinating with the commission. Sessions acknowledged communications but denied coordination. “I don’t know that coordinating is correct,” he responded. “We’ve been asked for assistance on several issues.”

Sessions also broadly endorsed the mission of the commission, stating, “I think it’s quite appropriate for the president to have a commission to review possible irregularities in elections.”

Earlier this month, Justice Department attorneys, representing the commission, released an index of communications involving commission members and staff as part of a federal lawsuit over the commission’s compliance with federal public records laws. The index revealed communications between commissioners and Department of Justice (DOJ) officials. On Tuesday, Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee had requested that the Justice Department turn over any communications with the commission. Their letter highlighted relevant exchanges in the index:

  • May 15, 2017:  “email exchange re: Chicago board of election” (DOJ official to Commissioner Christy McCormick) (#541)
  • June 15, 2017:  “email about setting up a time to speak”  (Andrew Kossack, the Commission’s designated federal officer, to DOJ official) (#687)
  • July 5-6, 2017:  “email exchange discussing voting issue with attachment” (DOJ Official to McCormick) (#544)
  • Aug. 1-2, 2017:  “email chain and planner setting a time for a call” (Kossack to Department of Homeland Security Official and Staff, DOJ) (#738 & 741)
  • Aug. 22, 2017:  “email re: collecting data from non-state entities” (Kossack to DOJ) (#748)
  • Sept. 5, 2017:  “email forwarding link to news article” (DOJ official to McCormick) (#564)
  • Sept. 6, 11, 2017:  “emails exchange discussing Chicago voting issue” (Third party to McCormick, DOJ official) (#565)
  • Sept. 15, 2017: “email exchange re: sending materials for litigation index” (Kossack to DOJ, King) (#343)
  • Undated:  Litigation documents and emails with DOJ (#778)

In their letter, committee Democrats expressed concern over potential coordination between the commission’s conservative members and the Civil Rights Division. “If these communications concern ongoing or contemplated cases or investigations in the Civil Rights Division, they could violate the Administration’s policy limiting contacts between the White House and the Department,” the letter stated. 

Democrats on the committee had already requested communications that members believe would include those listed on the index, and they renewed that request in their letter. The “index shows the Department has records of these communications in its possession and should be able to produce them to us without further delay,” they wrote. 

Voting rights advocates also want to know more about the communications between the commission and the Justice Department. Wendy Weiser, a voting rights expert at the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice, tweeted during the hearing:

As Mother Jones previously reported, the index cast doubt on the legality of the commission’s activities, including coordination with the Department of Homeland Security and third parties outside of government that the commission may hire to analyze the voter information it receives.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate