Memphis Wants to Get Rid of a Statue of a KKK Grand Wizard. Will Tennessee Officials Stop It?

The city has been fighting to ditch the monument for two years.

A Mississippi state flag waves in front of the statue and tomb of Nathan Bedford Forrest, rebel general, slave trader and early Ku Klux Klan member.Mike Brown/Commercial Appeal via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Monday, Mother Jones published an essay by Nate DiMeo chronicling the history of a hotly-debated Confederate monument in a park in downtown Memphis, Tenn. Last week, the effort to remove the statue was blocked again. 

Memphis city officials and activists have been working for two years to get rid of the monument, of Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard Nathan Bedford Forrest, along with a statue of Jefferson Davis that stands in another park. The Tennessee Historical Commission was scheduled to vote on an application from the city council to remove the Forrest statue on Oct. 13, but the vote has been delayed—possibly until February 2018. (The removal of the Jefferson Davis statue is a lower priority for the city council right now since a hearing on it probably will not happen until next year.)

On Thursday, the Commission chairman sent a letter to the city attorney informing him that the historical commission’s vote would be delayed pending the approval of a new set of rules governing applications for waivers that are submitted to the commission.

Memphis residents were frustrated by the delay. “Most of this community, the vast majority of Memphis, wants these statues down but wants to do it legally,” Mayor Jim Strickland said in a recent interview with local TV station WREG. “When I was on the city council, we voted to take these down, that’s like three or four years ago. It’s time for a decision.” 

The council is also losing patience with the commission. Early last month, city council members voted to sponsor an ordinance to override the commission and remove the Forrest statue from its current spot “to a more suitable location” such as Savannah, Tenn. or a Civil War Battlefield site in Mississippi. Forrest and his wife are also interred beneath the statue, and their bodies would be reburied in their original resting place in Elmwood Cemetery.

Allan Wade, the city council attorney, said the city could argue that Confederate statues keep African American people from accessing the parks, which would grant protection under a Supreme Court ruling guaranteeing equal access to parks regardless of race.

This is the latest move in a years-long battle between the Commission and the city that has intensified in the past few months in the wake of the Charlottesville protests. The city council first voted to remove the statue of Forrest in 2015, after a shooting at a historically-black church in Charleston, S.C. left nine dead.

It may seem strange that the Tennessee Historical Commission—a group formed under the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation that includes Gov. Bill Haslam and the State Historian—can overrule a city council vote. The Commission was granted that power by a state law known as the Heritage Protection Act passed in 2013 and amended last year designed to protect state memorials to the Confederacy.

Last year’s amendment made that rule more ironclad: Now a waiver can only be awarded in cases where two-thirds of the commission’s 29 members approve. The law, the Nashville Scene recently noted, was written partly by the Sons of Confederate Veterans, a group made up of “living descendants of the soldiers and civil servants of the Confederate States of America,” according to their website. The group says it has a “covenanted responsibility to preserve the Christian principles held by the Southern people which led to their decision to defend constitutional self-government” and its mission is “to preserve the memory and the good name of the noble soldiers, civil servants, and loyal citizens of the Confederate States of America, and the cause for which they fought and died.” Some members of the historical commission also belong to the Sons of Confederate Veterans.

City Attorney Bruce McMullen said back in August that he expected the commission to reject the city’s request for a waiver, and pledged to sue all the way up to the state’s Supreme Court if that was the case. If that happens, removal of the Nathan Bedford Forrest statue could take years.

According to a report from the Memphis Police Department, keeping the statue in the park has come at a high price for taxpayers. The overtime pay alone for monitoring four rallies August 15-28 cost the city $16,530, on top of $8,795 for typical patrolling at the parks during that time. 

The removal of the statue and the accompanying graves is widely supported in Memphis, a city with a long history of civil rights activism and a majority-black population. 

In a Facebook post Friday, the Memphis chapter of Sons of Confederate Veterans said they had “prayed hard” about the Forrest statue, and they were “pleased” with the Tennessee Historical Commission’s actions.

Read Nate DiMeo’s essay on the history of the statue here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate