Why the Scouts’ Move Might Unite Boys and Girls, But Divide America

Get ready for a co-ed culture war, with uniforms.

Jeff Critchen/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Yesterday the Boy Scouts of America announced that it would allow girls to participate in its core programs and earn the organization’s highest rank: Eagle Scout. The arrangement will start by integrating Cub Scouts, the portion of the BSA that serves boys from approximately 1st through 5th grades.

When the new system begins in 2018, dens—the Cub Scouts’ term for its smallest groupings—will remain single-sex. Existing packs, made up of several dens, will be allowed to choose to remain all male, incorporate female dens, or start a separate girl pack. The BSA’s plans for involving girls and young women in its core program, including the multi-year succession of merit badges and ranks culminating in Eagle that can last throughout high school, will be rolled out next year.

The BSA’s move has been rumored since the spring and has drawn criticism from the Girl Scouts of the USA, who, naturally, see it as a threat to their own organization’s numbers. But, as someone who made Eagle Scout while growing up in the South, I don’t think the BSA is really aiming for the Girl Scout’s existing constituency. Instead, I think it’s looking for girl members growing up in conservative households.

Despite a shared love of khaki and patches, and a common mission of providing young people with organized fun alongside outdoor skills and leadership and citizenship development, boy scouts and girl scouts are supported by completely separate entities in the United States.

Over the last 50 years, the Girl Scouts have made changes to their curriculum and outlook that mirror the social progress that American girls and women have made at home and at work. Brownies may still do some baking and arts-and-crafts projects, but Girl Scouts place a great deal of emphasis on female empowerment, education, equality, and financial independence. 

The Boy Scouts have their own lofty ideas about the kind of men they are out to create, but they come alongside others that are shaped by the organization’s conservative stakeholders. Boy scouting is far more popular among whites and religious people than among minorities and secular people. It is especially robust in the South and the West, particularly in Mormon country where congregations have heavily recruited boys. These regions—and members of the LDS church—have long had a strong presence on the organization’s decision-making bodies. 

The Girl Scouts’ unequivocal support for gay members and leaders has only grown more striking as the Boy Scouts spent the better part of three decades fighting to uphold a blanket ban on gay scouts and leaders. Only after much public controversy and a couple of halting steps did the Boy Scouts finally arrive at a position in 2015 that allows individual troops to decide the issue. (Atheists and agnostics remain banned.)

The Girl Scouts’ comparative progressiveness has drawn fire from conservative organizations and pastors who either simply oppose the boldest aspects of their empowerment message or use it to make lurid claims of lesbianism and premature sex. Family Watch International maintains a site accusing Girl Scouts of the USA of lobbying for global abortion rights and unwisely collaborating on a positive-body-image campaign with a plus-sized model who had once posed nude. Pro-life groups have even taken to organizing an annual “cookiecott.”

Parents with such hesitations about the Girl Scouts of the USA represent a rare growth opportunity for the Boy Scouts of America. Faced, like the Girl Scouts and other youth organizations, with declining numbers, the BSA has set out on a challenging path of expanding its market while threading narrow appeals: This summer, after the BSA decided to allow trans youth members, the Mormon church announced it would start its own scouting like program. 

Welcoming female members into its core program represents a profound shift for the Boy Scouts. And while it will unite some boys and girls together in co-ed troops and packs, it may only deepen divisions in our society that are so clearly mirrored in the divide of American scouting.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate