Elizabeth Warren is Taking Her War with Donald Trump to the Streets

The battle for control of the financial watchdog agency she launched heats up.

Ashley Dejean

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

While two rival acting directors battled in court for legal control of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, several dozen protesters gathered outside the watchdog agency’s headquarters on Tuesday afternoon to oppose the one backed by President Donald Trump.

Mick Mulvaney, who was announced as interim head of the bureau by the White House over Thanksgiving weekend, is a Trump’s budget director, a former member of Congress, and a vocal critic of the agency. He once co-sponsored a bill to eliminate the bureau, which was created in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

“We don’t come bearing doughnuts,” joked Adam Green of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which organized the rally, referring to a widely-reported anecdote that Mulvaney brought doughnuts to the agency’s office on Monday. “But we come bearing a message…We will not let Donald Trump and Mick Mulvaney literally break the law to install themselves at the head of the top consumer watchdog [agency].”

The dispute was teed up when CFPB director Richard Cordray announced that he had appointed Leandra English, his chief of staff, as deputy director shortly before he stepped down on November 24. The 2010 Dodd-Frank law, which established the agency, calls for the deputy director to become interim head in the absence of a senate-confirmed director.

But the Trump administration has argued that the law’s succession provisions don’t override the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, which states the president “may direct an officer or employee of such Executive agency to perform the functions and duties of the vacant office temporarily in an acting capacity.” On Sunday, English filed a lawsuit against the president and Mulvaney in Washington, DC’s federal district court, claiming she is the rightful acting director.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who spearheaded the effort to create the CFPB, headlined Tuesday’s demonstration, and called on the protesters to fight for the agency.

“No one should be cheated on credit cards or mortgages or student loans,” she told the crowd. “I believe everyone has to follow the law, and that includes Wall Street banks.”

People attending the rally told Mother Jones they are concerned that Mulvaney could destroy the agency from the inside. “Unregulated capitalism is a danger to democracy,” said retiree Abigail Woodward, who lives in the Washington region and learned about the protest in a Tuesday morning email. She worries a weakened CFPB will mean “power can cherrypick whether it wants to be held to the laws or not.”

While the court initially ruled late on Tuesday in Mulvaney’s favor, appeals are likely. But the courts’ final decision may only settle who runs the agency on an interim basis. The president can eventually nominate and seek Senate approval for a permanent head, who would have a clearer mandate and more power to transform the bureau.

“If Donald Trump wants to install a Wall Street representative to run this agency, he’s got a way to do that unfortunately,” says Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group. “If the Republicans in the Senate go along with that, we’re going to fight all the way. We’re going to have to get through a period where they try to undo all the good the agency has done.”

This post was updated shortly after publication to reflect the district court’s ruling.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate