Here’s Why Ed Gillespie Doesn’t Like to Talk About His Lobbying Clients

One repeatedly paid big settlements for alleged medical fraud. Others included tobacco giants.

Vice President Mike Pence, left, with Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Ed Gillespie at an October rally in Abingdon, Virginia.Andre Teague/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Virginia’s Republican candidate for governor, Ed Gillespie, likes to say heā€™s started three small businesses, but he usually doesn’t name them. Thatā€™s not surprising, given what they are: a lobbying shop that became one of the 10 biggest in the country, a public relations firm connected to a different lobbying powerhouse, and a public relations firm that he says represents ā€œcorporate America.ā€

His lobbying clients haven’t always been the kinds of businesses you’d want to list on campaign literature either. After co-founding Quinn Gillespie & Associates in 2000, Gillespie relied on a collection of corporate giants to build a business that pulled in $18 million per year. When Washingtonian magazine ranked DCā€™s top lobbyists in 2007, Gillespie came in eighthā€”four spots behind his Democratic partner, Jack Quinn. Now Gillespie and his campaign team are using that lobbying experience to say he “knows first-hand the challenges business owners face.”

In October, the Washington Post reported that, despite making college affordability a campaign priority, Gillespie spent years lobbying for loan providers who were trying to do ā€œthe exact opposite.ā€ His work for Tenet Healthcare, a Fortune 500 company that runs 77 hospitals, tells a similar story. Gillespieā€™s health care plan makes reducing medical costs a priority and calls for preventing ā€œwaste and abuseā€ by limiting doctorsā€™ ability to refer patients to themselves. A decade before, Gillespie lobbied for Tenet as it battled allegations of far more serious abuse.

When QGA signed Tenet, the company had just paid an $820,000 settlement after it was accused of improperly billing Medicaid. Three years before, the Justice Department secured a $54 million settlement following allegations that doctors at one of its hospitals had performed unnecessary heart procedures. One lawyer told the New York Times that more than 100 of his clients had received unnecessary bypasses. 

In 2006, the same year Gillespie started representing Tenet, the Justice Department said Tenet had inflated hospital charges and billed for services it had not provided. Lobbying disclosure forms show they were brought on to deal with one issue: ā€œMedicare Payment Issues.” Three months later, Tenet settled with the Justice Department for more than $900 million without admitting guilt. That may have been a victory: The Associated Press reported that some analysts were expecting Tenet to pay as much as $1.5 billion.

In 2012, Tenet once again settled for overbilling Medicare, paying $42 million without admitting guilt. The Justice Department said the improper billing happened between May 2005 and December 2007, when Gillespie and his firm were paid at least $480,000 to lobby for Tenet. The Gillespie campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Last year, Tenet paid a $513 million settlement for an alleged kickback and bribery scheme in which the owners of prenatal clinics were paid to refer undocumented Hispanic women to Tenet hospitals between at least 2000 and 2013. Some of the women were reportedly told they could deliver their children only at Tenet facilities. The Justice Department’s criminal charge stated that the deceptive information caused many pregnant mothers to travel long distances, putting their health at risk. As a result of the referrals, Tenet got more than $145 million from Medicaid and Medicare, according to the Justice Department. 

Many of Gillespieā€™s other clients were less controversial. Some were household names like Delta Airlines and NBC. A few were niche players, like a trade group that defends farmersā€™ right to make foie gras, the force-fed duck liver delicacy. Sometimes, combinations of clientsā€”such as tobacco giants followed by Friends of Cancer Researchā€”suggested a degree of ideological flexibility. Similarly, Gillespie lobbied for the Coalition to Advance Healthcare Reform, a group of large employers fighting for universal health insurance. They hoped to achieve that through a market-based solution and an individual mandateā€”the key components of Obamacare. As a candidate for governor, Gillespie supports repealing the Affordable Care Act.

What united Gillespieā€™s clients was their willingness to pay for results. Inside the firm, lobbyists appeared to get a kick out of the mercenary approach. In his 2012 tell-all memoir The Payoff: Why Wall Street Always Wins, Gillespieā€™s former colleague Jeff Connaughton said they set their political views aside while they lobbied for QGA. He said they joked that their true allegiance was to the “Green Party.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate