Official Analysis Finds Republicans Are Completely Wrong About Their Tax Bill Paying for Itself

The Senate tax bill is expected to add $1 trillion to the deficit over 10 years.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is surrounded by reporters on Thursday as Republicans move to pass their tax bill. J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday, Congress’ nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation found that the Senate tax bill will add $1 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. Thursday’s report is the first official congressional analysis to use a “dynamic score” that takes into account the tax bill’s likely impact on the economy.

Republicans have argued that their $1.4 trillion tax cut will pay for itself by boosting economic growth, and in turn eventually increase tax revenue. Multiple nonpartisan groups have found that the Republican tax bills would not come close to paying for itself, and hardly any economists believe the GOP claims. Now a congressional body that Republicans and Democrats frequently cite as an authority has backed that up.

In a letter to Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), JCT chief of staff Thomas Barthold said that to his “best recollection” the Senate has always relied on estimates from the JCT or the Congressional Budget Office, Congress’ other nonpartisan budget analyst. In 2015, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) decided to keep Barthold in charge of the JCT because of his “strong, nonpartisan” leadership and “objective reports.” But in recent weeks, Republicans have suggested they may rely on a still non-existent—and presumably much more optimistic—Treasury Department estimate. 

The likely turn away from the JCT and CBO comes after Republicans touted their accuracy on tax issues during the debate over repealing Obamacare earlier this year. “They’re pretty good at dollars; not as good at people,” then White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in March, arguing that Americans should believe joint JCT and CBO estimates predicting the repeal bill would cut the deficit but disregard projections that the legislation would leave millions more people uninsured. Ryan, now the speaker of the House, also cited the CBO in March, saying its report on Republicans’ health care bill showed it would cut taxes.

Republicans believe that cutting corporate taxes will be revenue neutral because it spurs economic growth, which then increases tax revenue. At first glance, some may find it surprising that a $1.4 trillion tax cut would create only $400 billion of revenue growth. There are a few reasons why that’s the case. For one, the JCT’s analysis assumes that passing the tax bill would lead to an “aggressive” response from the Federal Reserve, which is in charge of US monetary policy. That would likely mean tamping down economic growth by increasing interest rates to ward off inflation. Like other nonpartisan groups, the JCT also takes into account how increased government borrowing slows growth by crowding out private investment. Finally, the United States is already close to full employment and corporate profits are near record highs.

Earlier this month, a dynamic score from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton business school found that the Senate bill would add between $117 billion and $368 billion in revenue growth over the next 10 years. The conservative Tax Foundation—Republicans’ preferred tax think tank—projects that the Senate bill would add $516 billion in deficit spending. The Tax Foundation’s model has been criticized by nonpartisan groups such as the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget for ignoring how debt affects growth. Below is a graph that compares growth estimates from the Tax Foundation, Wharton, and the Tax Policy Center, which is a joint project the Brookings Institution and Urban Institute..

Credit: Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Traditionally, the JCT did not try to predict how a bill’s sticker price could be offset by economic growth. Republicans fought to change that for decades, and they finally succeeded in 2015. The change was widely seen as a way for Republicans to pave the way for tax cuts designed by Ryan. Democrats opposed the switch, saying it could lead to “voodoo economics” justifying huge tax cuts. Thursday’s JCT score shows that the committee has stayed well within the economic mainstream.

In 2014, Ryan pushed back against the liberal criticisms of dynamic scoring. “People say it’s dynamic scoring,” he said. “I really prefer to call it reality-based scoring.” Ryan has not yet said if he agrees with the JCT’s analysis.

Update: Minutes after the JCT analysis was released, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, the second highest-ranking Republican, said “I think it’s pretty clear they’re wrong.”

Below is the full analysis from the JCT:

JCT Dyanmic Score of Senate Tax Bill by Noah Lanard on Scribd

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate