This Ex-Prosecutor Is One of 2018’s Most Intriguing Candidates

Paul Pelletier, who’s running for Congress in Virginia, battled Obama’s DOJ over its weak effort to hold bank execs accountable.

YouTube/Friends of Paul Pelletier

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Paul Pelletier, a former Justice Department prosecutor, is the ninth Democrat to join the field of contenders vying for the chance to oust Rep. Barbara Comstock (R-Va.), one of the most at-risk Republicans in next year’s 2018 midterm elections. But in a year that has seen thousands of newcomers run for office in response to Donald Trumpā€™s presidency and the national political climate, Pelletier is one of the more intriguing first-timers.

In part thatā€™s because Pelletierā€”a gravel-voiced white-collar-crime expert who spent 27 years at DOJ prosecuting everyone from Miami drug smugglers and the dirty lawyers who enabled them to the $7 billion Ponzi schemer Allen Stanfordā€”can say heā€™s worked with and against both Democrats and Republicans. In journalist Jesse Eisingerā€™s book The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to Prosecute Executives, Pelletier is the closest thing to a leading man, the feisty prosecutor who clashed with Obama appointees at the DOJ over their weak-kneed approach to prosecuting the bank executives who helped torpedo the global economy.

During his Miami days, Pelletier says he saw firsthand how a functioning Congress and White House helped him better do his job by, say, passing tough money laundering laws, mandatory minimum sentences for drug trafficking, and reforms to the bail system. ā€œWhen youā€™re working in this nonpartisan law enforcement branch of the department, you can feel when congressmen and congresswomen are talking and working together to find solutions,ā€ he says. ā€œFast-forward to now. Itā€™s become clear to me whatā€™s clear to most voters: Thereā€™s so much dysfunction that no aspect of the government is working effectively or efficiently.ā€

Pelletierā€™s pitch is that his three-decade-career of prosecuting criminals of all varieties, working with Democratic and Republican administrations, and bucking members of his own political party when necessary shows that heā€™ll bring an across-the-aisle approach to Congress. He says he took a look at Comstockā€™s voting recordā€”she has voted with Trump 96 percent of the time, according to FiveThirtyEightā€”and wanted to support a Democrat who could beat her. He didnā€™t see anyone who fit the bill, so he decided, at age 61, to get in the race himself.

Like every other Democrat in the race, Pelletier faces the daunting task of getting the attention of northern Virginia voters in a packed field with no clear front-runner for a June 2018 primary. Congressional primaries are notoriously low-turnout affairs. In the Trump era, the challenge for any congressional candidate is rustling up even the smallest bit of name recognition among the party faithful.

The Democrat who squares off against Comstock in next yearā€™s general election faces the even steeper challenge of raising the millions of dollars needed to mount a credible campaign. Comstock, a two-term congresswoman and former Republican National Committee opposition research guru, raised $5.25 million in 2016, the ninth-most of any House candidate, according to OpenSecrets.org.

Pelletier, who joined the DC-based law firm Pepper Hamilton following his DOJ tenure, says Comstock is inextricably linked with Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and the GOP leadership. He says he plans to tap his deep networks in and outside of northern Virginia to mount a credible challenge for Comstockā€™s seat. And unlike most first-time candidates, he’s got ample experience in front of a camera. His old friends include the Farrelly brothers, who directed the movies Dumb and Dumber, Thereā€™s Something About Mary, and Me, Myself, and Irene. The Farrellys gave Pelletier parts in several of their moviesā€”here he is in Kingpin, bottom rightā€”which may earn him the title of most impressive IMDB page among the ever-growing roster of 2018 hopefuls.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate