Voting Rights Could Be the Biggest Winner in Tuesday’s Democratic Victories

Virginia, New Jersey, and Washington are poised to increase access to the ballot.

Ralph Northam and his wife, Pam, vote in Norfolk, Virginia, on Tuesday.Steve Helber/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Brianna Ross of Richmond, Virginia, lost her right to vote at 19 when she received a felony conviction for stealing diapers for her newborn son. Now 53, she voted for the first time in her life in Virginiaā€™s statewide elections yesterday.

ā€œI remember way back in 1993, when the judge told me, ā€˜You canā€™t ever vote,ā€™ā€ she told Sam Levine of the Huffington Post. ā€œI didnā€™t know what that meant, but it made me feel empty, it made me feel unimportant. But I voted today.ā€

Virginia was one of four states that blocked ex-felons from votingā€”disenfranchising 1 in 5 black Virginiansā€”until Gov. Terry McAuliffe restored voting rights to 168,000 ex-felons over the past year and a half. Ross was among them. 

Republican gubernatorial candidate Ed Gillespie sharply criticized McAuliffe and his lieutenant governor, Ralph Northam, for this policy. But Northamā€™s victory in the governorā€™s race on Tuesday means that Virginia will continue to restore voting rights to ex-offenders. It’s just one way that Democratic victories in Virginia, New Jersey, and Washington yesterday could lead to an expansion of access to the ballot.

Northamā€™s win also means Virginia Democrats will have veto power over the stateā€™s next redistricting process, which will take place after the 2020 Census, for the first time since 1991. That could lead to fairer maps that make the state more politically representative. Last night, Democratic candidates for the state House of Delegates received nine percentage points more of the vote than Republicans, but the body ended up with a 50-50 split, in large part because of Republican gerrymandering efforts. If Democrats take back the legislature following state senate and House elections in 2019, Virginia Democrats could also repeal the stateā€™s voter ID law, which requires a driver’s license or government-issued photo ID to cast a ballot. Northam has called the law ā€œunnecessary and restrictive.ā€

Elsewhere, New Jersey and Washington state could become the 11th and 12th states to enact automatic voter registration. Last year, New Jersey’s Republican governor, Chris Christie, vetoed a bill that would have automatically registered eligible voters when they obtain or renew a driverā€™s license or state photo ID at the DMV. Voting rights advocates said it could sign up 1.6 million unregistered voters in the state. Democrat Phil Murphy, who won Tuesday’s gubernatorial election, has pledged to sign the law and supports other policies to improve ballot access, including Election Day registration and an expansion of early voting. ā€œMake it easier for people to register, and give them more opportunities to cast their vote,ā€ Murphyā€™s platform said.

After Democrats gained control of the Washington legislature on Tuesday, that state is poised to pass a similar automatic registration law. Washingtonā€™s neighbor, Oregon, became the first state to adopt an automatic registration law in 2016, and the results were impressive: Oregon had the largest turnout increase in the country in the last presidential election, and the percentage of people of color registered jumped from 53 to 79. Ten states have now passed or implemented similar efforts.

Before Tuesday, 2017 had been a rough year for voting rights. More states had passed new restrictions on voting in 2017 than in 2016 and 2015 combined. But Democratic victories yesterday in three key states could begin to reverse that trend.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate