Festival of Slights, the 8th Night: Charlottesville

“How about a couple of infrastructure questions?”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Happy Hanukkah! Mother Jones is celebrating this yearā€™s festival of lights with a festival of slights. Specifically, President Donald Trumpā€™s slights toward the Jewish people.

When white nationalists marched on Charlottesville in August to protest the proposed removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee, their message wasn’t all about Confederate heritage. The night before the main rally, hundreds of demonstrators carrying tiki torches shouted ā€œJews will not replace us,ā€ a favored Nazi slogan, as they descended upon the University of Virginia. The anti-Semitism continued the next day, with signs bearing swastikas and messages that called Jews ā€œSatanā€™s children.ā€ Chants of ā€œSieg heil,ā€ the Nazi victory salute, and ā€œblood and soil,ā€ the Nazi racial purity slogan, could be heard alongside cries of ā€œwhite lives matter.ā€ These threats paved the way for the dayā€™s physical violence, which included the beating of a black man in a parking garage and a young womanā€™s death at the hands of a white supremacist who sped his car into a counter-protesting crowd. By the end of the day, the demonstrators’ condemnation of America’s ethnic and religious diversity had left dozens injured and three dead.

President Donald Trump spent that weekend at his New Jersey golf resort and remained noticeably silent. When he finally spoke, his comments offered little condolence. Instead, he seemed to assign blame to both the white nationalists and those who protested them, condemning “hatred, bigotry, and violence on many sides, on many sides.ā€

Uproar ensued over the president’s failure to unequivocally denounce white supremacy. When Trump finally condemned the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis in a statement the following day, he stopped short of calling out the alt-right political movement that enthusiastically backed his presidential campaign and has close ties with white supremacists. Shortly afterward, he retweeted a leading alt-right figure who appeared to complain about an excessive media focus on violence by white nationalists.

By the following Wednesday, the president was ready to move on. The nation was decidedly not. At a press conference on ā€œInfrastructure Week,ā€ reporters grilled Trump on his Charlottesville response, asking why he had waited two days to disavow white supremacy groups. The president said he needed to wait for ā€œthe facts.ā€

Trump begged to return to infrastructure. The reporters would not allow it. When they asked whether Trump would call the white supremacists in Charlottesville the ā€œalt-right,ā€ Trump responded by asking, “What about the alt-left that came charging at the, as you say, the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt?”

The press conference continued to unravel from there. Trump insisted that there were “some very fine people on both sides” and that some of the alt-right demonstrators “were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.ā€

Trump then pondered which historical figures’ statues would come down next. “I wonder, is it George Washington next week?” the president mused. “And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?”

At the end of August, rabbis representing Judaismā€™s reform, reconstructionist, and conservative traditions eschewed their annual High Holidays call with the president, calling his response to the violence in Charlottesville ā€œso lacking in moral leadership and empathy for the victims of racial and religious hatred.ā€ Trump returned the favor in kind, declining to invite Jewish politicians and activists who disagree with his politics to the White House’s annual Hanukkah party.

Read more from the Festival of Slights:

The 1st Night: Trumpā€™s Book of Hitler Speeches

The 2nd Night: The Sheriffā€™s Star

The 3rd Night: ā€œHolocaust Centersā€

The 4th Night: ā€œShort Guys That Wear Yarmulkesā€

The 5th Night: Trumpā€™s Closing Argument to Voters

The 6th Night: The Jew Counter

The 7th Night: The Holocaust Statement

Image credit: Shutterstock; farakos/Getty

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate