This Is How Many Billions of Dollars Each of the 15 Richest Families in America Will Save If We Repeal the Estate Tax

We also included the Trumps, who really don’t deserve to be on this list but also stand to pocket some serious cash.

Mother Jones

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

There are many ways in which the $1.4 trillion tax cut bill that Senate Republicans passed early Saturday morning—and the House’s version of the bill, which passed on November 16—disproportionately benefit America’s wealthiest citizens, and specifically the Trump family. One of the key reasons why is because of drastic changes to the estate tax—a tax on real estate and other assets passed down by someone after they die. 

While we at Mother Jones and others have already reported on how much the Trump family stands to gain from this legislation, it’s not only the Trumps who will have fuller pockets after the bill becomes law. President Donald Trump, according to Forbes, is only (only!) the 248th richest American. His kids could save about $620 million if the estate tax is repealed, but the families of even richer Americans, a group that notably includes some of the biggest donors to the Republican Party, would save billions—each. 

As it currently works, the first $5.5 million of an estate is exempt for an individual and, for a married couple, the first $11 million. For inheritances that exceed that value, owners are then taxed at a rate of 40 percent. Only an incredibly small number of Americans have to pay the estate tax each year: 2 in 1,000 estates (or 0.2 percent). Even so, the estate tax generates a significant amount of revenue: In 2016, the tax generated roughly $14 billion.

Both the House and Senate bills propose doubling exemptions to the estate tax, which would bring the total amount of an estate that can be passed down without taxes to $11 million for an individual and $22 million for a couple. The House bill, though, takes this one step further by proposing double exemptions until 2024, at which point the estate tax would be completely eliminated.

Mother Jones spoke with Americans for Tax Fairness, an advocacy group focused on progressive tax reform, about how these changes to the estate tax will benefit the ultra-wealthy, specifically the top 15 richest Americans, as ranked and reported by Forbes. If the exemptions are doubled, each estate would save $4.4 million for a couple, or $2.2 million for a single person. And if the tax is repealed, that’s where things get interesting: According to numbers crunched by Americans for Tax Fairness, in that scenario, the people who inherit money from this tiny group of people could potentially save more than a whopping $300 billion combined. And the families of GOP-megadonors Charles and David Koch could collectively save nearly $39 billion, while the heirs of Republican kingmaker and moneyman Sheldon Adelson could be looking at $14 billion. 

 

This is not to say the Trump kids won’t benefit; they still will:  

 

Bear in mind that these numbers are estimates and might not reflect exactly how much each estate will actually save. They are also calculated using a number of assumptions: that each person on the list is married (as marital status can and often does change), that each individual would pass on their entire estate, and that each person’s entire estate is actually taxable. (The amount a person passes on may be less than the full wealth listed here, based on how much they plan to donate before they die and other factors, like savvy estate planners.) “Any wealthy person is probably doing all sorts of things to avoid the estate tax” notes Jacob Leibenluft, a senior adviser at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Finally, a few of the people on this list—Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, and Michael Bloomberg—have signed “The Giving Pledge,” a promise to give away “more than half of their wealth to philanthropy or charitable causes during their lifetime or in their will,” which would alter how much of their estate would be subject to the estate tax. Since it’s not a binding pledge, we did not take it into consideration in these calculations. 

This chart rather indicates the maximum amount each person’s estate could potentially save if the estate tax is repealed.

The differences between the House and Senate versions of this bill of course still have to be reconciled before Congress can send a final version of the bill to President Trump to sign. But either way, it’s clear this group, along with the Trump children, will benefit immensely. “What we see as a result of the estate tax cuts in both the House and Senate bills are, I think, measures that would contribute to growing inequality,” says Leibenluft. “We should be thinking about how we more robustly tax inherited wealth, not going backward.”

Image Credit: Kin Cheung/AP; Victoria Bonn-Meuser/DPA/ZUMA; Markus Schreiber/AP

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate