Trump Is Going After Immigrants Without Criminal Records In a Big Way

A new report from ICE documents a rise in arrests within the US, and far fewer along the border.

Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The full reality of President Trump’s bombastic promises on illegal immigration is finally taking shape, and the picture is, unsurprisingly, bleak. After several reports pointing toward an increasing trend of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) targeting undocumented immigrants with no criminal background or low-level offenses—the exact people President Obama said the country shouldn’t prioritize deporting—we now have the statistics to paint a full picture: According to a new report from ICE, while border arrests have slowed, arrests of undocumented immigrants within the United States have in fact soared since Trump took office. The number of arrests of immigrants for civil violations increased by 30 percent, and the number of immigrants without criminal records arrested more than doubled. Overall removal numbers declined, however, by about 6 percent. 

The data, released on Tuesday, provides the most complete understanding to date of how the enforcement landscape has shifted since January, when the Trump administration issued an executive order that broadened enforcement priorities and expanded the categories of who could be considered a priority for deportation. The order, plus a subsequent February memo from then-Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, means that ICE “no longer exempts classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement,” according to the report, so that anyone who has come to the country without authorization could be deported. This notably reversed Obama-era policies, which focused on deporting immigrants with serious criminal convictions or who posed a threat to public safety.

The new numbers show that ICE is “arresting and deporting more people—and significantly more people—within the US than in the Obama administration,” says Randy Capps, director of research for US programs at the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank. Though deportation and arrest numbers are still nowhere near as high as they were during periods of the Obama and Bush administrations, the report confirmed immigration advocates’ fears that the Trump administration’s expansion of the definition of a “criminal alien” would in fact lead to more arrests and detention of immigrants for smaller charges—including those without any convictions at all. Arrests of undocumented immigrants with no criminal convictions actually represented the largest increase in types of arrests. ICE’s report also revealed the types of charges and convictions it considers criminal, revealing that two of the most common kinds of charges and convictions were traffic offenses. 

Here are the other key takeaways:

ICE is arresting thousands of more people for civil immigration violations.

The number of administrative arrests—those of immigrants who are found in violation of civil immigration laws—jumped after the executive order, ICE noted, increasing by 30 percent in FY2017 to over 143,000, the highest number of administrative arrests over the past three fiscal years. Administrative arrests of immigrants with known criminal convictions also increased by about 12 percent, amounting to about nearly 11,000 more arrests. 

The majority of people being arrested have criminal convictions or have been charged, though there are some shades of gray.

Reflecting its new enforcement policies, ICE listed out the categories of the criminal charges and convictions of the immigrants it arrested. ICE states that the “vast majority” of administrative arrests were of convicted criminals or of people with criminal charges, and that only 11 percent of people arrested had no known criminal convictions or charges. However, it’s important to note that the four largest categories of criminality among those arrested were driving under the influence, “dangerous drugs,” “immigration,” and “traffic offenses.” (Immigration crimes include illegal entry, illegal reentry, false claim to US citizenship, and trafficking, according to ICE.) 

It’s hard to tell whether this means that the majority of people were arrested for traffic offenses, however, because ICE counted all criminal charges and convictions for each person arrested—and someone may have more than one charge and more than one type of charge. As a result, the data does more to reveal the types of charges overall rather than what one individual has been charged for, says Capps. This also explains why the total numbers of criminal charges and convictions is higher than the total number of people arrested.

Arrests of immigrants without any criminal charges more than doubled over the past year.

ICE made 10,000 more “at-large” arrests, which are arrests that occur within a community as opposed to in a jail or prison setting, in FY2017 than during the prior year. ICE said that it increased these arrests after the executive order, particularly in areas where local or state law enforcement agencies do not cooperate with ICE or restrict access to its jails. Within those arrests, the number of immigrants who had no criminal convictions or charges saw significant increases. 

ICE significantly increased the number of immigration detainers it issued, but also had a record number of them declined.

A detainer is a request that ICE makes to law enforcement agencies, either asking the agency to notify ICE if a person subject to deportation is about to be released from criminal custody and to keep that person in custody. ICE noted that it issued 65 percent more detainers this year as compared to last year, but also received a record number of declined detainers from law enforcement agencies. According to ICE, this was the greatest number of declined detainers in the last three fiscal years, indicating that sanctuary policies may be having an effect. 

 

Overall, though, deportation numbers are actually lower than last year, primarily due to fewer arrests and removals at the border. 

ICE saw a 24 percent decrease in criminal border removals from fiscal year 2016 to 2017, and fewer people were arrested at the border, possibly due to an “increased deterrent effect from ICE’s stronger interior enforcement efforts,” the agency suggests. A larger share of removals are coming from interior arrests, and interior arrests now account for 36 percent of removals compared to 27 percent last year. 

Image Credit: Trump: Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP; Arrest: Yuri Arcurs/Getty

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate