Trump Is Going Ballistic Against Journalists. What Is He So Afraid Of?

His bitter attacks on reporters have escalated in recent weeks.

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Throughout Donald Trump’s first year as president, I’ve kept a running record of his authoritarian behavior titled “Trumpocracy.” A major component of this now very lengthy document has been his ceaseless attack on the American news media. But although Trump’s rants against reporting he dislikes are at this point extremely familiar (or daresay, normal), his assault on the free press has intensified in recent days. For Trump, if it’s not Fox News then it’s Fake News—and that now means war on a very personal level. Over the past two weeks, Trump has singled out no fewer than four individual journalists for bullying and ridicule, while his press secretary has threatened a fifth:

  • CNN’s Don Lemon: Blasting a “failing New York Times” report about his TV-viewing habits, Trump denied that he watches much CNN and highlighted for the public that he calls the CNN anchor “the dumbest man on television!”
  • The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel: When Weigel tweeted a misinterpretation of a crowd photo from a Trump rally in Pensacola, Florida on Friday, Trump called him out and demanded an apology and retraction from the “Fake News WaPo.” After Weigel quickly issued a correction and apology, Trump attacked him again, alleging Weigel’s mistake was intentional and declaring that he should be fired.
  • ABC News’ Brian Ross: After the investigative correspondent made a significant error, soon corrected, about Trump’s interactions with his former national security adviser Michael Flynn, Trump blasted Ross for “his horrendously inaccurate and dishonest report on the Russia, Russia, Russia Witch Hunt.” Trump went on to call Ross a “fraudster,” blamed him for a big drop in the stock market that was allegedly due to the erroneous report, and urged the public to sue ABC for financial damages.
  • MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough: A previous target of the president’s ire, the morning show host and fierce Trump critic came under attack again after NBC’s firing of Matt Lauer over sexual misconduct, with Trump dredging up a baseless conspiracy theory about the “unsolved mystery” of a young intern who died in Scarborough’s congressional office in 2001.
  • CNN’s Jim Acosta: Another previous Trump target, Acosta reported on Tuesday that he was threatened by White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders: He might be blocked from doing future coverage, she told him, if he asked Trump during a bill signing about a degrading tweet against Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.

Meanwhile, during this same period, Trump repeatedly praised content from State Television Fox News and personally promoted a new book by a Fox host—part of another long-term pattern:

Day 322: Trump urges the public to “go get the new book” by “Fox & Friends” host Brian Kilmeade, adding to a list of partisan supporters whose commercial products Trump has personally endorsed as president including Fox’s Sean Hannity (see Nov. 14), Fox regular Sheriff David Clarke (see Aug. 27), and others. (Dec. 7)

Trump also recently attacked the credibility of CNN International, no doubt to the delight of the multiple autocrats and dictators he’s praised from around the world.

That disparagement of a major global outlet for American news reporting came just two weeks after Trump shared a laugh with President Rodrigo Duterte as the Philippines strongman mocked journalists as “spies.” (Trump pulled a similar move in July with Vladimir Putin.) And Trump’s tirades against “fake news” are having a global impact, as the Times’ Steven Erlanger reported this week, emboldening unsavory regimes: After CNN aired video in November that showed a migrant in Libya being auctioned as a slave, Libyan leaders responded by citing Trump’s attacks against CNN in an effort to undermine the network’s reporting.

Trump has never stopped building on his declaration shortly after his inauguration that the media is the “enemy of the American people.” (That Stalin-esque comment was the uppercut to his former chief of staff Steve Bannon’s initial jab that the media was “the opposition party” and should “keep its mouth shut.”) But the stepped-up blows now—which have further included Trump bashing the press as “a stain on America” and proposing a competition among TV networks for a “FAKE NEWS TROPHY”—are also no coincidence. Most of the vitriol has followed the announcement of a plea deal between the disgraced Flynn and special counsel Robert Mueller, whose investigation into all things Trump-Russia has since surely struck fear into the White House.

Trump’s impulse to punch back even harder at the press also dovetails with a rising wave of attacks by Fox News and other unabashedly pro-Trump outlets against the Mueller investigation. As Trump seethes that the FBI is “in tatters,” Fox pundits liken the bureau, perhaps with a touch of projection, to “the old KGB that comes for you in the dark of night.” As Trump mocks the US “Justice” Department for allegedly failing to prosecute his former presidential opponent more than a year later, Fox pundits fervently demand the arrest of top FBI and DOJ officials.

Trump echoed such propagandizing in his speech in Pensacola last Friday, denouncing his perceived enemies among a “corrupt” and “rigged” system in the nation’s capital. “There are powerful forces in Washington trying to sabotage our movement,” he inveighed. “These are bad people. These are very, very bad and evil people. They know who they are….They will lie and leak and smear because they don’t want to accept the results of an election where we won by a landslide.”

Who knows whether Trump really views his presidency as fodder for a daily television show, as the Times recently reported in a piece citing 60 sources. But of course, what’s at stake with Trump’s unprecedented war on reported facts could not be more starkly real-world. The danger of ill-informed fear and panic that could potentially arise from, say, a president subverting the mainstream media less than two hours after a terrorist attack on an American city, as Trump did on Monday, is disturbing to ponder.

Where Trump’s information warfare will take the country remains an open, if unsettling question: As journalists have risen to the challenge of his lies and attacks, recent polling suggests the American public has greater confidence in the Fourth Estate than in the Trump White House, though that attitude appears less to straddle a sharp partisan divide.

But part of this equation is already clear. Trump loathes media he views as unfavorable to him—and he won’t hesitate to further weaponize that contempt against a pillar of American democracy.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate