For Sale by President Trump: A Leaky, Polluted Warehouse Caught Up in a Lawsuit

And it’s Donald Trump Jr.’s fault.

Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Anyone in the market for a polluted South Carolina warehouse thatā€™s mired in a messy lawsuit? Did we mention it has a leaky roof?

President Donald Trumpā€™s company, known for its glitzy real estate developments, is trying to find a buyer for just such a property, located in a North Charleston industrial park. The 157,000-square-foot warehouse is a vestige of one of Donald Trump Jr.ā€™s biggest business blunders, a deal his father had to bail him out of four years ago and one that is still creating headaches for the Trump Organization. 

In 2010, Trump Jr. and a few business partners launched a concrete company, Titan Atlas Manufacturing, and purchased the warehouse, once owned by Lockheed Martin, as the headquarters for their new venture. The company went bust after four years, leaving Trump Jr. holding a $3.65 million Deutsche Bank loan, secured by the warehouse. That was when the elder Trump stepped in, creating a new company, DB Pace Acquisition, which he used to buy the loan from the German bank (which was also Donald Trump’s biggest lender). Trump then foreclosed on the loan, taking the building into his own possession and out of the hands of his son’s failed concrete business. On his most recent personal financial disclosure, Trump listed DB Pace Acquisition as worth between $1 million and $5 million.

The property has caused the Trump Organization nothing but trouble. After the concrete business went under in 2014, Trump Jr. leased the vacant site to the French conglomerate Saint-Gobain, which used it to store roofing materials. In 2016, the French company sued the Trumps for $4.5 million, alleging that the building’s roof was in such poor shape that its merchandise was destroyed by water damage from a 2015 hurricane. According to the lawsuit, the company had previously and repeatedly asked Trump Jr. and Trump family lawyer Michael Cohen, who helped to manage the property, to fix the roof. Citing the steep cost of the repairs, Trump Jr. and Cohen allegedly said they would only do so if the French company agreed to renew its lease. Then the hurricane hit.

The Trump Organization is eager to get rid of the property, and it indicated in an October 2017 court filing that it was open to settling the suit with Saint-Gobain if it could find a buyer for the warehouse. “The sale of this property is critical to the resolution of the case as the sale will provide necessary liquid assets to be used for settlement purposes,” Trump’s attorneys wrote. 

There are some problems. The warehouse, among its other flaws, is environmentally contaminated. There’s no indication that the contamination was caused by Titan Atlas or DB Pace Acquisition, but both companies could face some liability for the cost of the cleanup. Trump applied to a South Carolina state program that facilitates the cleanup of industrial properties and removes the current owner’s liability for a previous owner’s activity. But last March, the state rejected the Trump application, because an applicant must prove it had no connection to the property’s previous owner and the Trump Organization did not submit the necessary paperwork.

How much is Trump asking for his leaky, polluted warehouse? The property is listed for lease with a commercial real estate company, but the listing agent handling the property did not respond to a request for comment from Mother Jones, nor did an attorney for the president’s company.

At one point, the Trump Organization did try to interest the federal government in this facility. 

In October 2016, when Trump was a month away from winning the presidency, Michael Cohen, according to emails released via a Freedom of Information Act request, told an employee of the Government Services Administration that Trump wanted to offer the Federal Emergency Management Agency the contaminated warehouse for use during a hurricane recovery. But the offer went nowhereā€”this is one disaster FEMA never had to deal with.

Image credit: Mark Reinstein/ZUMA; CharlestonIndustrial.com

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate