German Automakers Funded Tests That Exposed Humans to Toxic Car Exhaust Pollutants

Their research group also forced monkeys to inhale diesel fumes during experiments.

Franziska Kraufmann/DPA/ZUMA

A trio of German carmakers—Volkswagen, BMW, and Daimler, the owner of Mercedes-Benz—reportedly backed tests exposing humans and monkeys to pollutants from car exhaust. Evidence that the fumes are not harmful could potentially have helped the carmakers retain European tax breaks for diesel fuel, and influence the political debate around emissions.

The European Research Group for Environment and Health in the Transport Sector, an organization which was set-up and funded by the three carmakers, commissioned experiments on human participants at Aachen University, the German newspapers Stuttgarter Zeitung and Süddeutscher reported earlier this week. According to their reports, the university tested the effects of inhaling different levels of nitrogen dioxide, a component of car exhaust, on 25 healthy human subjects. The research group disbanded in 2017.

“No effect could be detected” in humans who inhaled the gas during the research group’s tests, Stuttgarter Zeitung reported, though the newspaper did not detail the nitrogen dioxide concentrations or exact length of exposure. Research has shown diesel fuel emits higher levels of nitrogen dioxide than gasoline. The Environmental Protection Agency describes nitrogen dioxide as a pollutant that can “irritate airways in the human respiratory system” at high levels—while long exposure to elevated concentrations can “contribute to the development of asthma and potentially increase susceptibility to respiratory infections.” According to the Washington Post, the experiments were conducted between 2012 and 2015. A researcher involved in the study told the paper “nitrogen dioxide levels resembled those found in normal work spaces.”

The news of the human tests comes only days after the New York Times revealed that the research group also studied the impact of diesel fumes on 10 cynomolgus macaque monkeys in 2014. The primates were held in airtight containers in an Albuquerque lab and exposed to fumes from either a diesel-powered late-model Volkswagen Beetle or a 1999 Ford pickup truck for hours, the Times reported. The Beetle the company provided was “rigged to produce pollution levels that were far less harmful in the lab than they were on the road,” the Times wrote; nonetheless, the results were inconclusive and the group failed to publish a complete study.

The negative health impacts of diesel fumes have come under increased scrutiny in recent years. In 2012, the World Health Organization classified diesel exhaust as carcinogenic. That same year, 72,000 people in Europe died prematurely because of nitrogen dioxide pollution, according to a committee of the European Parliament report. 

The revelations about the human and monkeys tests are the latest in a string of controversies for Volkswagen, which in 2015 admitted it cheated on diesel emissions tests—the scandal cost the company billions in fines. On Tuesday, Volkswagen said in a statement that as one of the “first consequences in connection with the animal tests” the head of the research groups’s external relations and sustainability would be suspended. “We are currently in the process of investigating the work of the EUGT, which was dissolved in 2017, and drawing all the necessary consequences,” the statement says, referring to the research group by its German initials, EUGT.

“The BMW Group in no way influenced the design or methodology of studies carried out on behalf of the EUGT,” BMW said in a statement to Reuters about the monkey tests. Damlier also distanced itself from the animal studies, noting, “We condemn the experiments in the strongest terms.”

The German government publicly condemned the experiments. “These tests on monkeys or even people are in no ethical way justifiable and raise many critical questions about those who are behind the tests,” government spokesman Steffen Seibert said during a routine news conference in Berlin, according to Reuters.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate