Republican Candidates Have a New Talking Point: It’s Obama’s Fault I Went to Prison

The deep state did it!

Mother Jones illustration

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Four years ago this week, Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.) threatened to throw a reporter off a balcony. Grimm, a former FBI agent from Staten Island, took offense at being asked by NY1 reporter Michael Scotto about criminal charges facing one of his campaign fundraisers. “You ever do that to me again I’ll throw you off this fucking balcony,” Grimm said, adding, “I’ll break you in half, like a boy.”

He didn’t, but Scotto’s line of questioning proved prescient. Grimm pleaded guilty to tax fraud later that year and served eight months in federal prison. Now that he’s out—and running for his old job again—Grimm has come up with a uniquely Trump-era excuse for his legal woes: The Deep State did it.

On Monday, Andrew McCabe resigned as deputy director of the FBI following intense criticism from the president and conservative media over the bureau’s Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe. Per the New York Daily News, Grimm weighed in on McCabe’s departure by seeking to connect the Trump administration’s war on the FBI to his own 2014 prosecution:

[Grimm] also named former FBI director James Comey and former Attorney General Loretta Lynch as part of a “politically corrupt team of players.”

He blamed them for everything “from sabotaging President Trump with the Russiagate conspiracy theory, to letting Hillary Clinton off the hook in 2016, and as far back as leveraging a civil business violation to drive me out of office in 2014.”

Grimm is not alone in hoping to use Trump-era conservative paranoia about federal investigations to elide his past transgressions. In West Virginia, another ex-con running in a Republican primary, former Massey Energy CEO Don Blankenship, is doing something similar in his bid to unseat Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin. Blankenship left federal prison last May after serving a one-year sentence for conspiring to commit mine safety violations in the run-up to the nation’s deadliest mine disaster in decades. Since getting out of prison, though, Blankenship has saturated the state’s airwaves with ads presenting his own theory of the case—that he was railroaded by the Obama administration, which wanted to cover up the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration’s complicity in the Upper Big Branch mine explosion. (Blankenship contends that MSHA’s safety regulations actually made the mine more dangerous.)

Blankenship’s argument doesn’t pass muster—state and federal investigations both found a persistent and calculating disregard for workplace safety at his mine that created the conditions that led to the disaster. But in a state where national Democratic figures are politically toxic, he’s hoping that the Trump-style frame of a good conservative businessman persecuted by the liberal elites will carry him through.

Meanwhile in Arizona, former Maricopa County sheriff Joe Arpaio has thrown his hat into the GOP primary to replace retiring Republican Sen. Jeff Flake. Arpaio was convicted of criminal contempt in 2017 for refusing to comply with a federal court order to stop racially profiling Hispanics, but he was pardoned by Trump before serving any prison time. After the pardon, Arpaio thanked Trump for recognizing that he had been victimized by “a political witch hunt by holdovers in the Obama justice department.” (The injunction Arpaio refused to comply with was in fact issued by a George W. Bush appointee.)

Their individual circumstances differ, but Blankenship, Arpaio, and Grimm are all making the same wager: They’re shorting the integrity of government institutions, because they’re betting that the president’s followers will, too.

Image credit: CQYoung/Getty; rasslava/Getty

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate