Republicans Are Poised to Release the Controversial Nunes Memo

The move is the latest effort by Trump partisans working to undermine the Mueller investigation.

mikolajn, adamkaz/iStock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee voted late Monday to release a four-page memo by GOP staffers spearheaded by Rep. Devin Nunes, the committeeā€™s chairman, that has become a cause cĆ©lĆØbre among President Trumpā€™s defenders. The vote means the memo can become public as soon as Trump now wants, as he has signaled he would like.

Republicans on the intelligence committee ignored a grave warning from the Justice Department, which has said releasing the memo without official review would be ā€œextraordinarily reckless.ā€ Although FBI Director Christopher Wray reviewed the memo over the weekend, no senior Justice officials outside the FBI were able to review it before Monday’s vote, according to Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores. DOJ officials unsuccessfully sought permission to review the document, Flores said.

Democrats described Monday’s vote as an unprecedented act of partisanshipā€”they said the release is part of a broader effort to impugn investigators and impede special counsel Robert Muellerā€™s Trump-Russia investigation.

ā€œWe have crossed a deeply a regrettable line,ā€ Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) the committeeā€™s top Democrat, told reporters late Monday. The intelligence committee also voted along party lines to block release of a competing memo prepared by Schiffā€™s staff, a document the congressman said would address blatant inaccuracies in the Nunes memo. The committee agreed to allow other House members to read Schiff’s memo. Schiff said Republicans on the committee also voted against allowing Wray to brief the panel on concerns about the releasing the document. 

Schiff also said Monday that the Republicans on the committee told Democrats they had opened an investigation into the Justice Department and the FBI. Republicans argue their investigation is limited to oversight of DOJ’s Trump-Russia investigation.

Mondayā€™s vote is among a number of recent, apparent successes by Republicans aiming to undermine investigations into Trump. Earlier Monday, Andrew McCabe, the FBIā€™s deputy director, decided to step down earlier than expected amid intense pressure from Trump and his allies. Critics faulted McCabe for overseeing an investigation last year into Hillary Clinton; they argue he should have recused himself because his wife ran for state senator in Virginia, and received campaign funds from the stateā€™s Democratic Party, controlled by longtime Clinton ally Terry McAuliffe, then the state’s governor. (McCabe did recuse himself from FBI investigations related to Virginia.) But animus toward McCabe from Trump and his supporters also stems from his reputation as an ally of former FBI Director James Comey, who Trump told NBC’s Lester Holt he fired over “this Russia thing.”

The Nunes memo reportedly faults Justice Department and FBI officials for failing to disclose that an application they made to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge for surveillance of Carter Page, a former Trump campaign foreign policy aide, included information based on research by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer whose work was partly funded by Clintonā€™s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

Experts on the FISA application process point out that the FBI would have had to confirm any information from Steele that it cited in a warrant application from other sources, an indication that Steele’s research was at least partly borne out. The New York Times reported that the memo focuses on approval by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein for renewing a warrant based on ongoing suspicions that Page was a Russian agent.

A finding that Rosenstein, Trumpā€™s own appointee, saw credible evidence even into 2017 that a Trump campaign aide was a Russian spy hardly helps Trump backersā€™ dismissal of the Russia scandal. But Republicans appear to be arguing that Steeleā€™s connection to Clinton invalidates any investigative findings based even partially on his research.

The Houseā€™s vote Monday launches a five-day period after which the memo will become public if Trump does not act. But the president can okay release of the document immediately. A White House spokesman said the administration would seek a full interagency and national security review of the memo before agreeing to release itā€”but Trumpā€™s evident eagerness to make the document public may prevail, Schiff said.

ā€œThey want the memo public even without having read it,ā€ he said. ā€œThat should tell you everything you want to know.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate