Donald Trump Joins With Kremlin Fans to Trash Mark Warner on Twitter

Both the president and pro-Russian interests are promoting a Fox News story revealing the Democratic senator’s texts.

Sens Mark Warner and Richard Burr during a Jan. 17 Senate Intelligence Committee hearing.Alex Edelman/ZUMA Wire

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Thursday night, a few hours before the government briefly shut down, President Donald Trump turned his attention to Sen. Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat at the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s investigation into Trump’s ties to Russia.

Trump tweeted about a Fox News story reporting that last year Warner had exchanged text messages with a lobbyist for a Russian oligarch in a bid to make contact with Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who authored the famous memos detailing alleged Russian efforts to compromise Trump.

Trump wasn’t the only one promoting the story to undercut the Senate’s Russia probe. So too were a horde of Twitter accounts linked to Russian influence efforts. According to the Alliance for Securing Democracy’s Hamilton 68 Dashboard, which tracks such activity, the accounts began tweeting about “Warner” and “Mark Warner” on Thursday night. On Friday afternoon, the words remained by far the most popular trending topic among the 600 accounts the group keeps an eye on. [Editor’s note: ASD discontinued the dashboard in 2018. The group has since been criticized for refusing to disclose specifics, including which accounts it was tracking and which if any were directly Kremlin-linked. This article has been updated.]

Accounts monitored by the organization regularly push news stories that cast doubt on investigations into the Trump campaign’s suspected coordination with Russia or advance counter-narratives that appear aimed at distracting from the scandal. But Thursday night marked a particularly clear example of them aligning with the president’s attempts to undermine the Trump-Russia investigation.  

Fox News reported that Warner last spring texted with Adam Waldman, a lawyer who is registered to lobby on behalf of Oleg Deripaska, a billionaire Russian aluminum magnate with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin and Trump’s indicted former campaign chairman Paul Manafort. Waldman’s firm, the Endeavor Group, says it offers “strategic, legal, and communications” services to “ultra high net worth individuals” and others.

Trump’s decision to reference Deripaska, albeit without using his name, was somewhat curious. Earlier Thursday, Alexei Navalny, a Russian opposition activist, alleged that Deripaska may have provided the Kremlin with information about the Trump campaign that he obtained from Manafort, a former business associate of Deripaska who appears to have owed the oligarch millions of dollars. In July 2016, while he worked for the Trump campaign, Manafort offered to provide Deripaska with “private briefings” about the campaign. Navalny’s wild story is based partly on videos, social media posts, and the memoir of a Russian escort who appears to have traveled with Deripaska on a yacht while he met clandestinely with a top Russian foreign policy official. Navlny argues the official could have served as a conduit through which Deripaska passed information from Manafort to the Kremlin. (A Deripaska spokesman told the Associated Press that Navalny’s “scandalous and mendacious assumptions are driven by sensationalism and we totally refute these outrageous false allegations in the strongest possible way.”)

The texts between Waldman and Warner suggest that Steele had a connection to Waldman. The former MI6 officer reached out to Waldman, asking him to contact Warner on his behalf in response to intelligence committee efforts to interview him, according to the texts. (Warner and Waldman were also in touch about the prospect of Deripaska testifying before the committee. But Deripaska offered to do so only if he was given full immunity from any potential criminal charges, a deal American officials rejected.) Warner’s outreach was an apparently informal bid to reach Steele. Republicans on the panel defended Warner, saying they knew of the contact with Waldman.

“Sen. Warner fully disclosed this to the committee four months ago,” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), a member of the panel, tweeted Thursday. “Has had zero impact on our work.”

An aide to Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), the committee’s chairman, told Fox News that the senator knew Warner was trying to reach Steele through a “back channel” and was not concerned by the effort. Burr in fact told reporters during an October news conference that he and Warner had each personally attempted to reach out to Steele.

“From the beginning of our investigation, we have taken each step in a bipartisan way, and we intend to continue to do so,” Burr and Warner said in a joint statement Thursday night.

For reasons that remain unclear, Waldman provided his texts with Warner to the committee in September. A “Republican source” shared them with Fox New, according to the report.

The Fox News report revealing Warner’s texts comes days after WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange direct-messaged a Twitter account he believed belonged to Sean Hannity to offer “some news” about Warner. Assange was actually messaging a spoof Hannity account. Assange’s errant DM raised questions about whether he had played a role in supplying the texts to Fox. The author of the story, Ed Henry, told the Daily Beast he had not communicated with WikiLeaks or Hannity about the Warner story.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate