The #MeToo Movement Is Coming to the Ballot Box This Month

There are eight upcoming special elections to replace disgraced men. Many of the candidates are women.

women's march

Erin Lefevre/Associated Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Monday, Minnesota voters will go to the polls for the 16th and 17th special elections of 2018. One district is suburban and leans Democratic; the other is rural and heavily Republican. But both races have one big thing in common: They were triggered by male lawmakers stepping down after allegations of sexual misconduct.

Over the past seven months, at least 14 state and national lawmakers have resigned or announced they will soon retire in the wake of sexual misconduct scandals that are roiling legislatures from California to Maine to Washington, DC. The result is a frenzy of special elections—and a mini-wave of women running to fill those seats. Of the eight impending special elections to replace disgraced male state legislators, Democrats are fielding women candidates in seven of them. (The lone exception: next week’s state house race in Mississippi, where all four candidates in the non-partisan primary are men.)

In Minnesota, Democrat Karla Bigham, a former state representative, is vying to fill the state Senate seat vacated by Dan Schoen, a Democrat who resigned in November. Schoen had been the target of a string of harassment accusations, included sending an unsolicited dick-pic to a senate staffer. (His attorney has said that “everything is taken out of context” and that the photo was sent by accident.) That election could have ramifications for the balance of power in the state—with Schoen’s departure, Republicans currently hold a two-vote majority in the upper chamber.

On the House side, Melissa Wagner, a Democratic social worker, is an underdog in the race to replace former Republican state Rep. Tony Cornish, who announced his resignation the same day as Schoen after the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported he had repeatedly propositioned a lobbyist and harassed a female colleague, among other transgressions during his eight terms in office. (Cornish apologized but denied any wrongdoing.)

On Tuesday, voters in the Oklahoma Panhandle will pick a replacement for former Republican state Sen. Bryce Marlatt, who resigned after being charged with sexual battery for allegedly groping an Uber driver. The Democratic nominee is Amber Jensen, an Army veteran who works with disabled kids. She faces GOP state Rep. Casey Murdock in one of the reddest parts of the country.

One week after that, Kentucky voters will fill the seat vacated by former Republican state Rep. Dan Johnson, who committed suicide in December after being accused of molesting a 17-year-old girl (an allegation he denied). The Democratic nominee, Linda Belcher, formerly represented the district. The Republican is Johnson’s widow, Rebecca Johnson.

No one has made made the issue of sexual misconduct as central to their campaign as Lori Berman, a Democratic state representative from Florida who is running for state Senate. Berman is hoping to replace former state Sen. Jeff Clemens, the onetime incoming Democratic leader, who resigned in October after Politico reported he’d had an affair with a lobbyist.

In response to the Clemens scandal, the Republican state Senate leader issued a new set of sexual harassment guidelines that called for complaints to be directed to his office. Berman took issue with that directive, accusing the GOP leadership of seeking to silence “victims by forcing them to confide in the same people who have the power to terminate their employment, and who many times have political allegiances to the members being accused of harassment.” It was “shameful,” she said in a campaign email last November. In her campaign kickoff, she argued that Tallahassee needed more women lawmakers “now more than ever.” (Her opponent, Tami Donnally, the executive director of a church ministry, is one of the few Republican women running to replace a disgraced male lawmaker.)

Special elections are, as a rule, a small sample sizes, and they are often a bit flukey. But these races do fit into a larger trend—the last 14 months have had a transformative effect on the role of women in progressive politics. The rise of Resistance groups such as Indivisible has been largely fueled by women. A dominant theme of the record-setting Women’s Marches was President Donald Trump’s own videotaped comments, in which he boasted about committing sexual assault.

EMILY’s List, the incubator for pro-choice women candidates, has seen a 26-fold increase in the number of women looking to run for office. And it’s been women staffers and lawmakers who have kept the #MeToo movement burning in state capitols and in Washington. (It was Democratic women such as Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York who ultimately forced Minnesota Sen. Al Franken to resign.) Former Trump aide Steve Bannon told Bloomberg recently he’s believes a women-led political backlash is “going to unfold like the Tea Party, only bigger.” Come November, it might just be the story of the midterms. But we may not have to wait that long to feel the effects.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate