Undercover Video Captures Trump Campaign’s Data Firm Discussing Entrapping Politicians With Sex

Cambridge Analytica’s CEO also boasted of using other shady tactics.

Channel 4

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

An undercover video report by Britain’s Channel 4 has captured footage of top executives at Cambridge Analytica, the controversial data-analytics firm that worked on Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, talking about sending Ukrainian “girls” to the home of an opposition candidate and covertly spreading propaganda online.

According to Channel 4, an undercover reporter for the network spoke with top officials from Cambridge Analytica on five separate occasions between November 2017 and January 2018 at different locations in London. The reporter posed as a “fixer” for a client hoping to influence Sri Lankan elections. One of the recorded meetings and a subsequent phone call included Cambridge CEO Alexander Nix.

On Saturday, a former employee for Cambridge Analytica went public with allegations that the company had harvested the Facebook data of 50 million people without their knowledge in a scheme that may have violated Facebook’s terms of services and data privacy laws. Facebook responded to the allegations by suspending Cambridge from accessing its platform until it had investigated the allegations. The company denied the charges, saying in a statement that ā€‹it “fully complies with Facebook’s terms of service and ā€‹is currently ā€‹in touch with Facebook ā€‹following its ā€‹recent statementā€‹ that it had suspended the company from its platform, in order to resolve this matter as quickly as possibleā€‹.” The company also denied allegations that it misused Facebook data as reported this weekend by the Observer, New York Times, and Channel 4. 

On Monday, Cambridge Analytica responded to Channel 4’s undercover report. “The report is edited and scripted to grossly misrepresent the nature of those conversations and how the company conducts its business,” the statement says. The statement includes this quote from Nix: ā€œIn playing along with this line of conversation, and partly to spare our ā€˜clientā€™ from embarrassment, we entertained a series of ludicrous hypothetical scenarios. I am aware how this looks, but it is simply not the case. I must emphatically state that Cambridge Analytica does not condone or engage in entrapment, bribes, or so-called ā€˜honeytraps,ā€™ and nor does it use untrue material for any purpose. I deeply regret my role in the meeting and I have already apologized to staff. I should have recognized where the prospective client was taking our conversations and ended the relationship sooner.ā€

The first segment of Channel 4’s undercover report aired Monday afternoon. The footage shows that, in response to a question about obtaining opposition research on political candidates, Nix says his firm could “send some girls around to the candidate’s house.” He adds that Ukrainian girls “are very beautiful, I find that works very well.”

Here is the full exchange, according to a Channel 4 preview of the segment:

Reporter: ā€œFor example youā€™re saying when youā€™re using the girls to introduce to the local fellow and youā€™re using the girls for this, like the seduction, theyā€™re not local girls? Not Sri Lankan girls?ā€
Nix: ā€œI wouldnā€™t have thought so no, weā€™ll bring some, I mean it was just an idea, Iā€™m just saying, we could bring some Ukrainians in on holiday with us you know, you know what Iā€™m saying.ā€
Reporter: ā€œThey are very beautiful Ukrainian girls.ā€
Nix: ā€œThey are very beautiful, I find that works very well.ā€
(ā€¦)
Nix: ā€œAnd the answers are hypothetical and thatā€™s really important is, is please donā€™t pay too much attention to what Iā€™m saying because Iā€™m just giving you examples of what can be done and what, what has been done. The right solution will be made for the right, for your problem.ā€

In another instance, Nix describes how to allegedly entrap a political candidate with a purported business offer. “We’ll offer a large amount of money to the candidate, to finance his campaign in exchange for land for instance,” he says. “We’ll have the whole thing recorded, weā€™ll blank out the face of our guy, and we post it on the Internet.”

At a January 2018 meeting, Nix also speaks about Cambridge’s supposed methods for going undetected in its efforts to influence campaigns:

ā€œā€¦we have a long history of working behind the scenes you know, many of our clients donā€™t want to be seen to be working with a foreign companyā€¦ So often we set up, if we are working then we can set up fake IDs and websites, we can be students doing research projects attached to a university, we can be tourists, thereā€™s so many options we can look at. I have lots of experience in this.ā€

A preview of the Channel 4 report notes that, in a later meeting, Mark Turnbull, the managing director of Cambridge Analytica’s Political Global division, pushes back on the notion that his company would engage in underhanded tactics in the context of elections. “Weā€™re not in the business of fake news, weā€™re not in the business of lying, making stuff up, and weā€™re not in the business of entrapment,” Turnbull told a Channel 4 reporter. “We wouldnā€™t send a pretty girl out to seduce a politician and then film them in their bedroom and then release the film. There are companies that do this but to me that crosses a line.”

Former Cambridge employees who’ve spoken to Mother Jones describe Nix as a consummate salesman who wouldn’t shy away from saying whatever was necessary to win new businessā€”without always following through on those pledges. “Alexander was always entertaining when meeting prospective clients,” one former Cambridge staffer told me.

Here’s the video:

This story has been updated.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate