The Only Pro-Choice Republican in the Texas Legislature Just Won Her District Primary

“I will not be told by anyone in Austin whether I am a Republican.”

Deborah Cannon/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The only pro-choice Republican in the Texas legislature secured her party’s nomination in Tuesday night’s primary, despite fierce opposition from the state’s arch-conservative governor, Greg Abbott. 

Sarah Davis, the moderate GOP incumbent for Houston-area District 134 defeated Abbott’s favored candidate, Susanna Dokupil, in the race to become the Republican nominee.

“The people of this district sent a message to those in Austin that we reject the politics of personal destruction, of anything-goes deception, and of pitting Republican against Republican in the name of amassing personal power,” Davis said in a victory speech Tuesday evening.

She added, “For the record, I will not be told by anyone in Austin whether I am a Republican.”

While Davis’ victory might be a blow to Abbott’s agenda, it likely increases the odds that her district will remain under GOP control come November. Voters in the affluent, purple-ish district that Hillary Clinton won in 2016 may be willing to cast their ballots for a Republican—but only for the right Republican, Davis told Texas Monthly.

In the past months, Davis was endorsed by the Houston Chronicle and by outgoing state House Speaker Joe Straus, a Republican who is often identified as a moderate. When asked in an interview with the Texas Tribune whether Abbott would get her vote in the governor’s race, Davis said she would likely “just not vote.”

Davis will face off against Democratic candidate Allison Lami Sawyer in the general election this November.

Dokupil was assistant solicitor general when Abbott was Texas attorney general, and she’s a vocal supporter of Abbott’s agenda. She was supported by anti-abortion activists and Jonathan Stickland, a Republican state representative and member of the Texas Freedom Caucus, a group of deeply conservative state representatives.

As I wrote earlier this month, Davis and Abbott have clashed over legislative priorities over the course of Davis’ tenure in the House.

[Davis] pushed back against key parts of Abbott’s 2017 agenda, including his failed efforts to increase state funding of private schools and ban transgender people from using the bathroom that corresponds to their gender identity. Davis—along with the other two state representatives Abbott is trying to unseat, Wayne Faircloth of Galveston and Lyle Larson of San Antonio—also drew Abbott’s ire by siding against the governor in a fight over ethics reform. The three lawmakers backed unsuccessful legislation that would have barred governors from accepting hefty campaign donations from people who receive state appointments, a proposal that Abbott viewed as a slap in the face.

Abbott backed two other challengers to Republican incumbents, one of whom beat the incumbent, according to the Texas Tribune update on Tuesday night. 

In her acceptance speech, Davis said the state Republican party’s divisive leadership in Austin had to stop. 

“It’s time that our party ends purges and starts building bridges.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate