Black Students Are Way More Likely to Be Suspended. The Trump Administration Doesn’t Seem to Care.

A new report shows just how bad the problem is.

Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos with President Donald TrumpOliver Contreras/Sipa via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Black students and students with disabilities are disciplined more harshly and more frequently at school than their peers, according to a new report from the federal government’s nonpartisan watchdog organization. The findings, released Wednesday by the Government Accountability Office, could have serious implications for the Trump administration’s efforts to strengthen school safety and discipline measures in the wake of the Parkland school shooting.

The report found that black students, boys, and students with disabilities were disproportionately disciplined in public schools during the 2013-14 school year. The disparities began as early as preschool and occurred regardless of the type of disciplinary action taken or the type of school attended. The study also controlled for students’ household income and found that the disturbing pattern applied to black students regardless of their socioeconomic class. Though black students represent roughly 15 percent of all public school students, they account for nearly 40 percent of all students suspended from school.

The report builds upon GAO findings from May 2016 that showed racially and socioeconomically isolated schools—that is, highly segregated schools—had disproportionately higher rates of students who were suspended or expelled. Both reports were requested by Rep. Bobby Scott (Va.), the top Democrat on the House education committee, and Rep. Jerry Nadler (N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee. These findings are further bolstered by Education Department civil rights data, which show that black students are 2.2 times more likely to be either referred to law enforcement or arrested at school than white students.

The latest study was released in the midst of a debate among federal lawmakers about school safety, sparked by February’s school shooting at Parkland’s Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. While Democrats have tried to keep the focus on new gun control measures, Republicans have steered the conversation toward repealing the Obama administration’s 2014 guidance that sought to mitigate the very inequities documented in these reports. (Since the new study looked at the school year that began before the 2014 guidance was released, there’s little information available about its impact.)

Republicans, including Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.), have argued that the Obama-era recommendations—which aim to limit racial disparities in discipline and the overuse of extreme punitive measures, such as expulsions and school-based arrests for nonviolent offenses—have allowed violent students to remain in school, cultivating the conditions that led to February’s school shooting. A spokesperson for the House education committee Democrats, meanwhile, insists Republicans are simply looking for an excuse to repeal the 2014 guidance, which has been on Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’ chopping block since before the Parkland shooting.

Recent statements from members of the Trump administration have not bolstered confidence that the executive branch understands the dangers posed by discriminatory discipline. At a March Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen, Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) asked FBI Acting Deputy Director David Bowdich if President Donald Trump’s proposal to arm teachers would include implicit bias training designed to prevent teachers from shooting innocent students based on unconscious racial prejudice. Bowdich responded that he’d “never really put the two together.” And late last month, when DeVos appeared before a House Appropriations subcommittee to discuss her department’s proposed 2019 budget, she dodged questions about whether she thinks racial bias contributes to the high rates of discipline experience by students of color.

Wednesday’s report was released on the same day as DeVos’ school safety and climate summit, in which educators, school officials, and others discussed whether the Obama-era guidance should be rescinded. The conversations, which were closed to the press, will help inform the work of DeVos’ school safety commission, an administration-wide group that Trump has tasked with providing recommendations to prevent future school violence.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate