“I Will Never Drink Again”

Readers react to our investigation linking alcohol and breast cancer.

Mother Jones; gradyreese/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Mary Roth was diagnosed with breast cancer at 52. She always wondered why she developed the disease but her three sisters did not. “I drank and drink more alcohol than my sisters ever did,” Roth wrote to Mother Jones. “I suspected that was what caused my breast cancer. It makes sense. Now I am convinced.”

Roth is one of the more than 400 readers who have written in since reporter Stephanie Mencimer shared her personal tale and investigation into the link between alcohol and breast cancer. Mencimer chronicles how her own experience with breast cancer led her to discover the science clearly connecting alcohol to cancer—and the booze industry’s efforts to downplay the risk. “More than 100 studies over several decades have reaffirmed the link,” Mencimer explains.

After reading the story, several readers talked about the mixed feelings they now had. “Holy crap! I like alcohol. I have an average of one drink a day … This is a compelling article,” wrote Linda L. Another reader, Suzan, found that the link between alcohol and breast cancer was “hard to reconcile with my otherwise health-obsessed lifestyle (organic foods, yoga, walking, avoiding lurking carcinogens in other forms.) I pride myself on keeping up with health news. I have a love/hate relationship with this article.” Others expressed frustration with the business behind the story, “The alcoholic beverage industry is working hard to make us customers just as the tobacco industry has done in the past,” wrote Julie Houston.

Many of our readers are grappling with what this investigation means for their lives. “This is shocking and hard to swallow,” wrote Isabel. “I’m 23 and my social life revolves around drinking moderately—sometimes drinking a lot.” While some readers say they were reconsidering their drinking habits, others were more definitive about giving up alcohol altogether. “I will never drink again,” writes Elaine Guenette. 

Several people wrote to us about a loved one who died from breast cancer, wondering if drinking played a role in the disease. “I lost a good friend whose children were patients of mine,” wrote Arthur Mollin. “She hosted many wine tastings and back then, we frequently got together for some intense wine indulgences. She died of breast cancer as did her mother. We, of course, didn’t factor in the alcohol. I wonder, I wonder.” 

While many readers took the article as a much-needed public health warning, some were skeptical. “I should be dead by now if drinking alcohol causes breast cancer,” Rose Houser wrote. Some aren’t convinced alcohol is something the public needs to be especially cautious about. Eric Radent, a cancer survivor, wrote, “My advice is to forget about all of this advice from the professionals and do all things in moderation. Drink wine, eat meat, etc., and enjoy your life.” 

Around 40 people who have or had breast cancer reached out, and many of them said they wished they had understood the risks of drinking. “I’m a breast cancer survivor and have to admit I still drink, but less, and often feel guilty when I do,” wrote Kim Mollin, who’s also one of the many parents who tell us they’re worried about their children’s drinking habits. “It makes me very fearful for my daughters who drink way more than I did. I will continue to be more careful but the information needs to come from more objective sources like this, to our children.”

We want to hear from you

Do you have a reaction to Stephanie’s story you’d like to share? We may use your response in a follow up story.

Update: We hosted a Facebook Live Q&A with Stephanie on April 19 and incorporated many of your questions and reactions. Watch it here.






We may share your response with our staff and publish a selection of stories which could include your name, age, and location. We respect your privacy. Your email address will not be published and by providing it, you agree to let us contact you regarding your response.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate