Married Immigrants Seeking Green Cards Are Now Targets for Deportation

People applying for legal status through their spouses are instead being detained.

Immigrants become US citizens at a USCIS ceremony in Phoenix.Jack Kurtz/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Fabiano de Oliveira had a clear path to staying in the United States: His wife was a US citizen, and he had a five-year-old son and no criminal history. He had been ordered deported to Brazil but was still eligible for a green card through his marriage. In January, Fabiano and his wife, Karah, met with US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to prove their marriage was legitimate. The immigration officer decided it was, bringing Fabiano a step closer to becoming a permanent resident. And then the officer told Fabiano that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) wanted to speak with him.

Fabiano was arrested and placed in detention. His story, which was featured in the New York Times on Thursday, is part of a larger trend. Under the leadership of its hardline director, Thomas Homan, ICE is targeting people with deportation orders when they meet with immigration officials at USCIS. This tactic presents unauthorized immigrants with an agonizing choice: continue living without legal statusā€”at a time when Homan has said all undocumented immigrants “need to be worried”ā€”or risk being arrested while trying to obtain legal status in the United States.

Leon Rodriguez, who led USCIS in the final years of the Obama administration, says the arrests could create an atmosphere where immigrants are ā€œchilled from doing what otherwise is their right to do.ā€ USCIS ā€œfield offices are places where there is serious, life-changing business that goes on,ā€ he says. ā€œThere needs to be an atmosphere of calm. People need to be comfortable.” Todd Pomerleau, one of de Oliveira’s attorneys at the Boston law firm Rubin Pomerleau, says his firm tells clients who could be arrested at a USCIS interview that they should have a “war chest” of several thousand dollars ready to fight to get out of immigration detention. 

The ICE arrests undercut a USCIS policy that makes it easier for some unauthorized immigrants to become legal residents without spending months outside the United States. Before 2016, de Oliveira would have had to leave the country, visit a US consulate, and apply for a waiver to allow him to receive a green card. There was no guarantees of being approved, and many people were wary of leaving the country only to discover they would not be allowed back. In July 2016, USCIS announced that people like de Oliveira could receive a provisional waiver while still living in the United States, greatly reducing the risk. Now ICE is arresting people the rule was designed to help, even though it is still in effect. It is not clear how many people have been arrested at the interviews. Arwen FitzGerald, a spokeswoman for USCIS, says the agency does not track how many arrests are made at its offices. She says the provisional ā€œwaiver is intended to shorten the wait time and separation from families…but it does not eliminate the consequences of a final order of removal.ā€

An ICE official, who requested anonymity, says, “USCIS exists to provide benefits and protections under the law, and so we cooperate in that process by and large, but those judges’ [removal] orders have to mean something.” The ICE official says that people who demonstrate the “veracity” of their marriage to USCIS may be released from immigration detention. But in January, de Oliveira was detained immediately after USCIS determined that his marriage was legitimate, and he was released only after petitioning a federal court. He is now wearing an ankle bracelet to track his location and checking in with ICE while he goes through the green card process, Pomerleau says.

The ACLU of Massachusetts filed a lawsuit last week to try to block ICE from arresting people at the meetings. The ACLU argues in its lawsuit, ā€œIn effect, the governmentā€™s one hand beckons [people] forward, and its other hand grabs them.ā€ Pomerleau hopes the case will lead to a nationwide injunction and allow immigrants across the country to feel safe when they attend interviews to legalize their immigration status.

Immigrants without criminal records had little risk of being arrested in the later years of the Obama administration. ICE is now deporting undocumented immigrants regardless of how long they have been in the United States and whether they have followed US laws. The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a nonpartisan research center, reported on Thursday that 43 percent of new cases brought by the Department of Homeland Security in immigration court last month involved people who had been in the United States for at least two years, compared with 6 percent of cases in December 2016.

ProPublica and the Philadelphia Inquirer reported last week on a Pennsylvania judge, Elizabeth Beckley, who called ICE when a couple came to her courthouse to get married. The outlets wrote:

When the constable announced he would be detaining Parker for ICE, the couple was stunned. Though born in Guatemala, Parker, 21, had been adopted by American parents when he was 8 months old. At that moment, he was technically undocumented, with his green-card renewal being processed. But he does not speak Spanish or consider himself an immigrant, much less a deportable one.

Undocumented immigrants are also being arrested at what were once routine meetings with ICE. Homan argues that the arrests are necessary to deter future unauthorized immigration. John Sandweg, who served as ICEā€™s acting director during the Obama administration, considers the arrests a way of padding the agencyā€™s arrest numbers by targeting ā€œlow-hanging fruit.ā€ Pomerleau compares the practice to arresting a person who goes to the police station and says, “I heard you want to talk to me.” He adds, “It’s a lot easier than doing a manhunt.” 

Fitzgerald says in an email, “USCIS is not a law enforcement agency, but may contact U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in certain cases, which may include unexecuted final orders of removal, as determined on a case by case basis. Please note, however, that interviews are not scheduled for this purpose.”

ICE spokeswoman Jennifer Elzea says in an email, “Individuals with a final order of removal have already been afforded full legal process in the nationā€™s immigration courts and must depart the country. If they choose to violate that judicial order, they could be subject to arrest, detention and removal. This does not reflect a change in policy. ICE is merely upholding the immigration laws of the United States.”

Pomerleau says the aftermath of the USCIS arrests is “catastrophic” for families. “They come to your office, you see the hope in their eyes…And then you tell them that they have a straightforward process they can utilize to live the American Dream,” he says. “And then they go to the interview and it turns into a nightmare.”

This piece has been updated with comment from USCIS and ICE.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate