Teachers Have Been Getting Screwed in Oklahoma for Generations

Just ask this kilt-wearing band director from Tulsa.

Edwin Rios/Mother Jones

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In 1990, when he was nine years old, Heath Miller protested alongside his parents at the Oklahoma Capitol building. His mother was a special education teacher in the state, and his father worked for the Oklahoma Education Association, the statewide teachers union. Thousands of teachers like the Millers were asking for smaller class sizes, more money for classrooms, and better salaries. 

“When you’re a kid, you don’t really realize what you’re doing,” Miller tells Mother Jones. “I remember thinking, ‘Here are all these teachers and they are doing this because it’s important to them that schools have money.'” 

Now it’s coming full circle for Miller. As the 36-year-old band director at Memorial High School in Tulsa, Miller and his peers are now pushing that same message from when he was a kid, the last time Oklahoma teachers shut down schools to demand for better pay and more funding. In many ways, little has changed.  

In 1990, it took four days of pressure from Oklahoma teachers to force the state legislature to approve $230 million in school funding. This time around, the fourth consecutive day of the shutdown—Thursday—came and went with no resolution, as hundreds of schools in at least 65 school districts across the state remain closed. As the state Senate and House adjourned yesterday without passing funding measures to possibly end the stalemate, it became clear that this month’s walkout would mark one of the longest periods in state history that teachers have shuttered schools in protest. 

A music teacher for the past eight years, Miller stood out among the swarms Thursday—donning a kilt that extended below his knees and an unbuttoned white shirt with a black fanny pack resting on his belt, holding a sign: “They kilt our funding.” 

The school spending cuts in recent years, he says, have been felt inside his own classroom and throughout Memorial High School. Foreign language courses have been eliminated at times, and one of his classes is left without enough textbooks to keep up with the large class size. “You try keeping 47 teenagers focused on a music history class. It’s impossible,” Miller says, adding: “I barely have enough chairs for 47 kids. I have ceiling tiles falling off. Half my lights in my classroom don’t even work anymore, and we don’t have enough custodial staff to pay to get them on a ladder to replace those lightbulbs.”

When Gov. Mary Fallin approved a raise for teachers last week, Miller appreciated the sentiment but questioned how much his salary would actually rise as a result. The raise would provide an average boost of $6,100 for teachers per year, depending on the teacher’s experience. “I would rather have had every penny of that sent into the classroom,” Miller says. “Don’t get me wrong, I want a raise just as much as everyone does.” But he preferred funding to help the students: “I’m not asking for a brand new high school. I’m just asking for lights.” 

Adequate funding for a school like Memorial High is all the more important as more than 90 percent of its students qualify for free and reduced lunch. Many of Miller’s students, he says, “can’t afford instruments so they are using school instruments, which we don’t have nearly enough of.” 

Even still, he refuses to leave Oklahoma, as many other teachers have decamped to neighboring states. “I could make 20 grand more moving to Arkansas. But Oklahoma’s home,” he says. “You don’t leave your home just because it needs work. You do what you’ve got to do to fix the place.”

As Miller reflected on his parents’ walk out, he noted that his decision to join his colleagues in Oklahoma City drove home a point still relevant 28 years later: “This is about having money for schools. This is about having money for kids.”

“I knew with no doubt in my mind I was going to come to this walkout if it happened,” he says. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate