Evan Jenkins’s Campaign Is Every Bit As Racist As Don Blankenship’s

“Lawlessness, looting, and liberalism.”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Don Blankenship has been drawing bipartisan condemnation over his racist—and bizarre—rhetoric in the West Virginia Republican Senate primary. “Swamp captain Mitch McConnell has created millions of jobs for China people,” Blankenship says in one recent ad targeting the Senate majority leader. He then attacks the family of McConnell’s wife, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, who was born in Taiwan. “His China family has given him tens of millions of dollars,” Blankenship says.

But Blankenship’s bigoted statements—along with his candidacy’s general outlandishness—have overshadowed an equally inflammatory ad campaign launched by one of his supposedly more mainstream GOP opponents. Several weeks ago, Rep. Evan Jenkins released this spot, which takes aim at Hillary Clinton for telling an audience that her 2016 presidential campaign had “won the places that are optimistic…moving forward, and [Donald Trump’s] whole campaign…was looking backwards.”

“It’s Hillary who’s got it backwards,” Jenkins says to the camera. “The big cities she won are the places flooding our state with heroin—where lawlessness, looting, and liberalism rule. Chicago’s the murder capital of America. Yet they want to take our guns away? That’s backwards.”

While Jenkins is saying this, the viewer sees footage of a man who appears to be African American being arrested in Detroit; fires burning, apparently during the riots sparked by police violence in Baltimore and Ferguson, Missouri; a violent anti-Trump protest in Berkeley, California; and a crime scene in Chicago. The message is unmistakable: Black people who voted for Clinton, along with a handful of university town antifa activists, are somehow to blame for the opioid epidemic in West Virginia, a state that is 92-percent white.

Jenkins ad Detroit
Jenkins ad Baltimore
Jenkins ad Chicago

West Virginia is the epicenter of the opioid crisis, with more than 43 deaths per 100,000 residents in 2016. It’s true that a significant amount of heroin and other opioids are smuggled through large cities; according to the Drug Enforcement Agency, traffickers from Detroit, Columbus, Pittsburgh, and Chicago supply heroin and controlled prescription drugs to addicts in West Virginia. A 2016 investigation by Washington, DC’s WJLA noted that “police across the area say their heroin addicts are driving to Baltimore to buy the deadly drug, sometimes even twice a day.”

But it’s absurd for Jenkins to imply that his state’s drug tragedy is the fault of people of color who live in liberal cities that have been home to protests against police brutality. As WABC put it, “Baltimore is not the reason why heroin use is exploding in local communities…everyone with whom we spoke blamed the escalating demand for heroin on the wave of prescription pain pill abuse. The cheaper form of the same is heroin. It’s an opioid.”

According to the DEA, “The extraordinarily high abuse rate of opioids [in West Virginia] is attributed in part to the large number of jobs in heavy manual labor such as mining, timbering, and manufacturing. These professions often cause injuries to workers that are treated with opioid pain relievers, which in turn can lead to addiction.” Over the past decade, drug companies have have shipped a staggering number of prescription opioids into small West Virginia towns. The Charleston Gazette-Mail has reported that distributors sent more than 780 million doses of oxycodone and hydrocodone to the state’s pharmacies over a six-year period—a scandal that the paper says is “widely blamed with starting the opioid crisis.”

For his part, Blankenship has cried foul over Jenkins’s ad—but not for the reasons you might hope. “Wait a minute,” the narrator of a Blankenship response ad declares. “The problem with this Jenkins ad is that Jenkins voted to let West Virginia cities take away our gun rights.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate