Grover Norquist Has Lost His Spot in the NRA’s Inner Circle

Two years after a failed recall effort, the antitax crusader loses a reelection bid.

Antitax activist Grover Norquist Manuel Balce Ceneta/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As the National Rifle Association kicks off its annual convention in Dallas, Texas, it will announce the results of its latest election for its board of directors—which will no longer include antitax crusader Grover Norquist. 

Unofficial results published by the shooting news site Ammoland show that Norquist, the founder of Americans for Tax Reform, lost his most recent reelection bid. It’s true,” says Todd Rathner, a gun and knife rights lobbyist and NRA board member. “What happened was he ran on a huge ballot with a lot of people. It had nothing to do with him.” Norquist, he says, “was running in a big field with some bigger names and higher profiles, and, quite frankly, people who campaigned pretty hard and got out there on the internet and did stuff.” (Norquist did not respond to a request for comment.)

Norquist was first elected to the NRA board in 2000. In 2016, a recall campaign contended that he was in cahoots with Islamists trying to infiltrate the NRA. Rathner led an effort to defend Norquist, and the recall effort failed. Norquist’s recent loss, Rathner says, “had nothing to do with the controversy—I mean, sure, there might be people leftover who remember that, but I don’t think it had any effect.” 

The NRA board has 76 members who serve three-year terms and are elected in batches of 25. (The 76th member is selected at the annual convention.) Only NRA life members and members who have part of the organization for five or more years may vote in board elections. Norquist and 34 other candidates ran in the most recent election. 

Traditionally, the board has low turnover. Norquist was one of 23 incumbents to run, 19 of whom were reelected. The newly elected board members include Lois & Clark actor Dean Cain. Among those who did not grab a seat were Adam Kraut, who released records showing that celebrity board members Ted Nugent, Tom Selleck, and Karl Malone missed all eight of the most recent meetings. 

Rathner tried to make light of Norquist’s loss: “It’s just a volunteer position. It doesn’t mean any extra money or great super powers. And he might run again. I suspect he probably will.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate