He Voted for Trump. Now He’s Running for Congress as a Pro-Pot, Pro-Coal Democrat.

And progressives are thrilled.

Mother Jones illustration; Mark Helenowski; Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On most nights during the nine-day West Virginia teacher strike last winter, Richard Ojeda could be found at his office in Logan County, gesturing wildly at his iPhone. Ojeda, a 47-year-old ex-Army paratrooper who is rarely seen outside the state Senate chamber in anything other than a tight-fitting Grunt Style T-shirt, had been logging on for hourlong Facebook Live segments about once a week since getting elected in 2016. During his first year as a senator, he typically got a few hundred viewers for his riffs about the corruption in his Democratic Party, his campaign for Congress, or his proposal to turn reclaimed surface mines into vast fields of marijuana and lavender.

Then, in January, Ojeda became the first politician in Charleston to say out loud what the teachers in his district had begun to discuss among themselves: If the state didnā€™t shore up public-employee health plans and increase their pay, theyā€™d walk. A few hundred viewers turned into a few thousand. By the time the protests got going, a quarter of a million people were viewing his videos. Families would gather around to see him recount the latest developments. And Ojeda went from a locally known figure to a rising star, someone who, in the eyes of his supporters, could not only upend West Virginia, but maybe offer Democrats in other deep-red enclaves a blueprint for fighting back.

ā€œHeā€™s like Elvis right now,ā€ says Jay Oā€™Neal, a middle school teacher from Charleston. ā€œA rock star,ā€ says Katie Endicott, a Mingo County teacher who helped organize the first round of walkouts. Ryan Frankenberry, executive director of the West Virginia Working Families Party, says, ā€œItā€™s like watching people listen to Jesus.ā€

A gun-loving, pro-life, pro-coal Trump voter who once promised to ā€œfistfightā€ Barack Obamaā€™s Environmental Protection Agency, Ojeda doesnā€™t fit the profile of a progressive firebrand, and in many ways heā€™s not. Heā€™s seeking to replace Republican Rep. Evan Jenkins, who is leaving to run for the US Senate, in a district President Donald Trump carried by 49 points. But the strike was a catalyst for a Resistance of a different sort. In places like West Virginia, Kentucky, and Oklahoma, teachers and other public employees were rebelling less against Trump than against decades of austerity while corporationsā€”particularly extractive industriesā€”bled their states dry. Ojeda, like the man he supported for president, has found a following in West Virginia by talking about the stateā€™s economic and political powers with unusual directness. But he wants to channel that anger toward far different ends. And he might even win.

Ojeda (pronounced Oh-Jed-uh) grew up in the small coalfields city of Logan, not far from where he lives now. He boasts 200 years of mining experience in his family tree, including by his paternal grandfather, an undocumented migrant from Mexico. During the early 20th century, Logan was the epicenter of armed conflict between union miners and management, culminating in the nearby battle of Blair Mountain, the largest domestic uprising since the end of the Civil War. Ojedaā€™s populism is infused with references to that past. ā€œWhen you take away the voice of the working-class citizens,ā€ he said in one Facebook Live segment last year, ā€œwe might as well go back to slavery and start printing scrip.ā€

Ojeda joined the Army after high school and retired 24 years later as a major, although it would be a stretch to say he ever left. He campaigns in combat boots and cargo pants and keeps his head shaved on the sides like a new recruit. Instead of “hello,” he says ā€œAirborne,ā€ which is also how he says goodbye. Every Facebook Live session ends with an identical signoff: ā€œSappers clear the way, Airborne all the way.ā€

After returning home, following a career that included three tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan, Ojeda taught ROTC at the local high school and started a nonprofit that provided meals and shoes to kids. But good deeds could do only so much. So in 2014 he challenged 19-term incumbent Rep. Nick Rahall in the Democratic primary. Ojeda accused Rahall of ignoring the drug abuse and blight of communities like his. He lost, but his anger struck a nerve. Two years later, he challenged his Democratic state senator and won. It nearly killed him.

At a campaign cookout before the primary, a man Ojeda had known since childhood attacked him with brass knuckles and then tried to run him over in a truck. Ojeda, who believes the attack was politically motivated, needed 58 metal plates in his face, but the assailant spent just nine months in jail. The episode, and the light sentence that followed it, fueled Ojedaā€™s paranoia about his political enemies, and he now speaks of his campaign in an almost messianic tone. ā€œIā€™ve been told by people, ā€˜Ojeda, they are going to kill youā€™ā€”theyā€™ve already tried once,ā€™ā€ he said in one Facebook Live session. ā€œIf He means for me to be murdered up some holler someplace to open the eyes of every one of you out there, then make no mistakes about it: Iā€™ll drive up that holler.ā€

Ojeda often fixates on issues that donā€™t fit neatly into partisan divides. He won his seat largely by talking about sewer pipes, crumbling pedestrian bridges, cellular dead zones, and potholes. In the Senate, heā€™s championed medical marijuana and better wages for teachers and prison guards. Where those issues convergeā€”and what makes some progressives in the state view him as a transformative figure rather than simply a man of the momentā€”is in how he proposes to pay for something better.

ā€œWe’re not really a state. We’re a colony,ā€ he says. ā€œEverything we’ve ever hadā€”timber, coalā€”it’s all been extracted out of our state. Our people have been here and have worked in those industries, and they remained poor, but the people outside of our state that are the ones that come and get the timber, get the coal, have become billionaires.ā€ His agenda is explicitly focused on breaking that cycle and redistributing the wealth of the state back to the people who work there.

Marijuana is a big part of it. He views it as a chance to do what West Virginia never did with coalā€”develop a billion-dollar industry that pulls its own weight and pays for the kinds of things like roads and teachers that lawmakers have neglected by claiming poverty. Ojeda gets wide-eyed talking about fields of pot. ā€œColorado just gave the largest pay raise to teachers in the history of America,ā€ he says. ā€œWe could do thatā€”we can do better than Colorado. Colorado gets one crop a year. We can do two.ā€ Weed would also provide low-cost, high-quality pain relief, which would strike a blow, he believes, at pharmaceutical corporations that have fueled the stateā€™s opioid epidemic. ā€œWhere I come from, Big Pharmaā€™s the enemy,ā€ he said at a recent campaign stop in Huntington, the biggest city in the district. ā€œBig Pharmaā€™s the Talibanā€¦Theyā€™re Al Qaeda.ā€

During the teacher strike, teachers outside the state Capitol chanted ā€œtax gas.ā€ Eventually, even the stateā€™s billionaire, coal-baron Republican governor, Jim Justice, was saying it. But Ojeda had been talking about it for months. West Virginia is in the middle of a boom in natural gas, which many in the state hope might supplant the flagging coal industry. But Ojeda fears the state government is giving away its natural resources (not to mention property rights) without getting much in return, just like it did with coal and timber. He has proposed a 2.5 percent hike in the natural gas severance taxā€”a royalty on all gas thatā€™s extracted from undergroundā€”and an additional 15 percent tax on any natural gas thatā€™s pumped out of state.

Ojeda loves coal but hates coal bosses. One of his top agenda items, should he go to Washington, is shoring up pensions for former coal miners whose old companies have used legal and financial restructuring to get out of those liabilities. Executives who do things like that, he says, ā€œshould be in prison. Their homes should be auctioned off, their cars. Everything that they have should be gone.ā€

Even his defense of legal abortion and Planned Parenthood, despite the fact that he is avowedly pro-life, is partly about inequality: Blocking access would hurt the poor, he explains, while the rich would still find ways to get abortions.

Those populist instincts have forced Ojeda into some major contradictions, none more glaring than his 2016 vote for president. He wasnā€™t just a Democrat who happened to support Trump; he was profiled in The New Yorker as a public face of those Democrats. In what many in his party consider the most clear-cut political choice of their lifetimes, Ojeda the veteran, the champion of the working man and undocumented immigrants, went with a draft-dodger who grew rich by stiffing contractors and proposed mass deportation.

Ojeda told me heā€™d supported Bernie Sanders during the primary. He says he regrets his vote for Trump but admits to being taken in by Trumpā€™s rhetoric on coal. ā€œAll of a sudden, somebody’s talking about putting West Virginia back to work and getting people back on track,ā€ he says. ā€œIs everything that he’s saying right? No, but hey, maybe he’s right here.ā€ He was more skeptical of Hillary Clintonā€™s economic redevelopment plan for Appalachia, which she unveiled in a campaign visit to West Virginia. ā€œThe jobs that they were going to retrain coal miners to do do not exist in West Virginia,ā€ he says. ā€œYou’re saying, ‘Take all these coal miners, teach them a job that they’re going to have to leave the state for’? That’s the problem.ā€

Coal is where the radicalism of Ojedaā€™s economic message shines through brightestā€”he talks about banning the industryā€™s lobbyists from his officeā€”but itā€™s also what makes his message such an awkward fit for the Democratic Party. Because his impulse about Clinton was kind of right: You wonā€™t create new coal jobs if Democrats run Washington. I asked how he intends to work with a Democratic Congress to fight climate change while pushing to reopen every shuttered coal mine in West Virginia. ā€œI donā€™t know,ā€ he replied. He insists those coal mines would be opened only on the condition that they keep the air and water clean and the miners safe. But environmentally friendly mountaintop removal is an oxymoron. Something will have to give.

For now, Democrats in West Virginia have been willing to forgive Ojeda. Thatā€™s partly because a lot of them voted for Trump, too. But itā€™s mostly because heā€™s doing something people like Joe Manchin, the stateā€™s hanging-by-a-thread Democratic US senator, have never done: challenging the economic structure of the state. Itā€™s what a populism actually rooted in economic anxiety might look like. ā€œHell,ā€ says Frankenberry, who previously worked for Rahall, ā€œhe ran for state Senate against the coal association. Who does that? No one. No one.ā€

His campaign has flown under the radar of national gatekeepers like the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, but Ojeda frequently notes the backing of the Peopleā€™s House Project, an organization launched by former MSNBC host Krystal Ball that has endorsed working-class candidates such as Wisconsin ironworker Randy Bryce. Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), whom Ojeda supports for speaker of the House, has called him a model for how Democrats can win back red states.

After the teacher strike, itā€™s not as wild as it once sounded. Democrats across the stateā€”including more than a few teachersā€”are running on the platform of weed, severance taxes, and better pay that Ojeda has championed. And the uprising Ojeda cheered on in West Virginia has grown into a national movement. Teachers have scored a series of victories across the country by pushing similarly populist arguments. Following mass demonstrations, Oklahoma funded its new teacher pay raises with a tax hike on oil and gas, an industry as untouchable in that state as coal is in Ojedaā€™s. And Ojedaā€™s burgeoning celebrity back home has caused national observers to take note. The Cook Political Report recently moved the third district out of its “safe Republican” column, in part because of Ojeda’s surging candidacy. After we spoke in Huntington, he was off to lunch with ABC News. Then he had an interview with NPR. By the time he set off canvassing that afternoon in his dusty red Jeep, his entourage had swelled so muchā€”two camera crews and a half-dozen campaign staffersā€”that each stop looked like a Publishers Clearing House announcement. Passersby stopped to gawk.

A few hours later, Ojeda dropped by a meeting of a Marshall University veterans group in the back room of a sports bar. He was in his element, bantering with the crowd about getting treated for cysts at the VA and the quality of food on base. His internal polling, he said, put him up by a large margin in the May 8th primary over Paul Davis, who runs Huntingtonā€™s bus system, and Shirley Love, a state delegate.

Should Ojeda make it to the general election, heā€™ll face one of a half-dozen Republicans vying to replace Jenkins, a man he describes as ā€œunbuttered toast.ā€ The most natural foil for Ojeda might be Rupie Phillips, a Logan County delegate who has the endorsement of the coal trade association. Phillipsā€™ opening campaign video mentioned coal 19 times in 72 seconds. Ojeda boasted to the audience in Huntington that he was beating both Phillips and Conrad Lucas, the former state GOP chair, among registered Republicans. Then he took a shot at another Republican delegate in the race, Carol Miller, a buffalo farmer who helped make the Bible the official state book, for accepting money from the drug manufacturer Pfizer.

Companies like Pfizer, he said, ā€œdonā€™t want to give you something that really helps, which is cannabis, because they canā€™t control it. They donā€™t want you to be able to grow it because they canā€™t control the cash flow. Thatā€™s what this really is.ā€ It was a standard Ojeda affairā€”he promised to keep the coal mines open, fight Attorney General Jeff Sessions to help the stateā€™s weed industry, and boost worker pay. He also proposed putting armed veterans in every school to deter shooters. As he wrapped, he stood, one boot perched up on a chair in a Captain Morgan pose, tattooed biceps flexed, and told the attendees to stay in touch. ā€œYā€™all can give out my phone numberā€”(304) 792-9833,ā€ he said. ā€œI donā€™t care. Give me a call. Doesnā€™t bother me at all. I get calls from all over the place now. People from Washington, DC. People from Portland, Oregon. ā€˜Is this really you?ā€™ Yeah itā€™s me.ā€

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate