Missouri Might Impeach Its Governor Amid Sexual Assault Allegations

Catching up on the craziness going down in the show-me state.

J.B. Forbes/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A St. Louis prosecutor dropped a felony invasion-of-privacy charge against Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens earlier this week. But the governor’s troubles are far from over. As the Missouri legislative season came to a close last night in Jefferson City, representatives in the GOP-controlled legislature convened a special 30-day session to consider impeaching the first-term Republican, who is still awaiting trial for a second, unrelated felony.

Missouri leaders of both parties were already calling for Greitens to resign a month ago, in the wake of two damning reports released by the Missouri House Special Investigative Committee on Oversight detailing allegations that the governor sexually assaulted a woman he was having an affair with, and illegally transferred a donor list from his charity to his campaign.

Any other year, the fact that the sitting governor of a state has refused to step down in the face of sexual misconduct claims, abandonment by his party, and the threat of impeachment would be A1 news. But in the era of Donald Trump, the Missouri governor’s troubles seem to have largely escaped national notice.

So how did we get here? The public scandal surrounding Greitens began in January, when a local news channel published a surreptitious recording made by the ex-husband of the governor’s former hairdresser, with whom he had an affair in 2015. In it, she discloses the affair and says that when she went to Greitens’ house for the first time, he took a partially nude photo of her without her consent, and threatened to release it if she told anyone about him. (Greitens admitted to the affair but denied that he threatened to blackmail the woman.) Based on the blackmail allegations, a grand jury indicted Greitens in February on a felony invasion-of-privacy charge, carrying a maximum sentence of four years.

Up until Monday, the case was prosecuted by St. Louis circuit attorney Kim Gardner, who spent months searching for the photograph at the heart of the case while the governor’s defense team attacked her office’s handling of the investigation. Gardner still hadn’t found the picture by May 14ā€”the eve of trialā€”when circuit judge Rex Burlison ruled that Greitens’ high-powered defense team could call Gardner as a witness to testify about potential misconduct by one of her investigators. Within hours, Gardner dropped the charges, stating that her office had “no adequate means of proceeding with the case” but might ask a special prosecutor to refile the charges.

Greitens declared “victory” on Monday night, writing that “we all have to deal with suffering, but if we deal with it in the right way, we can emerge with strength.”

But he’s pretty much the only one celebrating. While a handful of Republican donors might be rallying around Greitens, as the Kansas City Star reports, basically no one has come to the governor’s defense publicly. Last month, Trump spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders called the allegations “very concerning,” and the White House has since declined to comment, even as it inquires quietly about whether the scandal might implicate Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, Nick Ayers, formerly a top campaign advisor to Greitens.

Gardner’s blackmail case against Greitens skirted the most serious claims of sexual misconduct. Those emerged in an explosive April 11 report from the Missouri house special committee, detailing testimony from the hairdresser that during an appointment, Greitens put his hand “all the way up to [her] crotch” without consent. At his house, she said, Greitens allegedly exposed her and tried to kiss her, which she did not want, then coerced her into oral sex after she started crying. “It felt like consent, but, no, I didn’t want to do it…I felt as though that would allow me to leave,” she told the committee.

While observers wondered aloud why the governor had not been charged with sexual assault, state attorney general Josh Hawleyā€”a GOP “golden boy” currently running for US Senate against Claire McCaskillā€”announced that his office had discovered evidence that Greitens had committed a second, unrelated felony: illegally using a donor list from a veterans’ charity he founded. Gardner charged Greitens with felony computer tampering last month. (“This prosecutor will use any charge she can to smear me…I will clear my name,” Greitens responded in a statement.) A trial date has not been set.

Members of the Missouri house are expected to hold several days of hearings as they consider impeachment next week, ABC News reports. If they vote to go forward, the Senate will appoint a seven-judge panel to preside over the impeachment trialā€”a first for a Missouri governor.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We canā€™t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who wonā€™t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its futureā€”you.

And we need readers to show up for us big timeā€”again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate