The New NRA President Has Just the Right Record: Shady Weapons Sales and Covering Up the Truth

Oliver North. It makes sense.

Oliver North

Oliver North testifying at a 1987 Iran-Contra hearingScott Applewhite/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

It makes sense that the National Rifle Association should anoint, as it did on Monday, Oliver North as its next president. North, a conservative firebrand, first gained public notice—or notoriety—three decades ago as the master plotter at the center of the Iran-Contra scandal. His actions as a mid-level operator within the National Security Council of Ronald Reagan’s White House—actions that came to be celebrated by the right—demonstrated a perverse version of patriotism: Laws, rules, and constitutional government could all be avoided or trampled in the zealous pursuit of policy ends. So he should fit in well at the NRA.

The Iran-Contra affair was essentially two scandals in one. The Reagan administration secretly sold weapons to Tehran and covertly supported the rebels opposing the socialist Sandinista regime in Nicaragua. North and his co-conspirators crossed streams and used the money they raised in the Iran arms deal to buy weapons and supplies for the Contras. They resorted to such skullduggery because Congress had prohibited the Reagan administration from providing lethal assistance to the Contras.

These arguably illegal shenanigans—designed as an end-run around Congress—were revealed in late 1986, triggering an extensive congressional probe, an independent counsel investigation, and several criminal prosecutions. North was prosecuted and found guilty of obstructing the congressional investigation, stealing and destroying evidence, and accepting an illegal gratuity. His convictions, though, were thrown out on what the law-and-order crowd might call a legal technicality. An appeals court found that witnesses in North’s trial were potentially affected by testimony North had given to Congress under a grant of immunity. 

The Iran-Contra scandal was a dark episode, in which the US government hooked up with shady arms dealers and a variety of sleazy crooks and con men around the globe, including drug-runners. At a time when Nancy Reagan was promoting her “just say no” campaign, the secret operators of her husband’s administration were saying yes to a host of shady miscreants. And North was among those making common cause with criminals. 

A 1998 report by the CIA inspector general on CIA-Contra drug connections quoted a chief of station for the CIA in Central America during the Contra war, noting that he was aware of allegations that some Contras were involved in drug trafficking. But, he added, “we were going to play with these guys. That was made clear by Casey and Clarridge.” He was referring to then-CIA Chief William Casey and Duane Clarridge, the chief of the agency’s Latin America division. 

North, too, played along. According to several entries in notebooks he kept while working at the NSC, he was aware of ties between Contras and drug smugglers. The National Security Archive, a nonprofit research outfit, has chronicled these records. In an August 9, 1985 entry, North summarized a discussion about a plane used to bring supplies to the Contras in Honduras: “Honduran DC-6 which is being used for runs out of New Orleans is probably being used for drug runs into U.S.” In a July 12, 1985 entry, he referred to an arms warehouse in Honduras and noted he was told, “14 M to finance [the arms in the warehouse] came from drugs.”

North also received a memo from his liaison to the Contras in April 1985 reporting that officials in a group of Contra units included one rebel believed to have “potential involvement with drug running” and another who was “involved in drug running out of Panama.” Moreover, as the National Security Archive pointed out, in February 1986, North received a memo noting that a plane used for carrying aid to the Contras had previously been used to transport drugs. (By the way, the drug-runner who owned this plane was paid more than $300,000 by a State Department office overseen by North and two other administration officials for ferrying supplies to the Contras.)

In 1988, a Senate subcommittee chaired by then-Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) issued a report concluding that North and other senior officials ignored reports of drug smuggling related to the Contras. It pointed out that North had eagerly worked with Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega, a known drug trafficker, to win Noriega’s assistance in the war against the Sandinistas. And there’s more: North led a behind-the-scenes effort to obtain clemency for José Bueso Rosa, a Honduran general who had plotted to finance an assassination attempt against the Honduran president with a $40 million cocaine shipment to the United States. Why? Bueso had helped the Reagan administration’s clandestine Contra operation. North and his colleagues ended up getting Bueso a reduced sentence. 

During the Iran-Contra scandal, North and his colleagues in the Reagan administration conspired to evade a law passed by Congress and engaged in underhanded means to subvert the rules of democracy. But maybe a fellow with an established record in shady weapons deals and covering up the truth is just the right guy to lead the NRA.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate