Savvy Doctors Can Convince Reluctant Parents To Vaccinate Their Kids

A new study shows that persistence pays off.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A vaccine that can prevent certain kinds of cancer has been on the market for decades—but American children’s immunization rates with it are still woefully low. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that all children receive a series of human papillomavirus immunizations when they’re 11 or 12, yet less than half of teenagers are up to date. That’s partially because many parents are reluctant to vaccinate their children against diseases caused by sexually transmitted infections. But a small new study, published in the journal Pediatrics, finds that physicians can change parents’ minds about the vaccine—if they’re persistent.

Researchers from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center recorded 43 clinic visits at which children were due for their first HPV vaccine. In 37 of the visits, they observed, parents expressed reluctance to let their children get the vaccine. All of the children whose doctors acquiesced (with statements like, “maybe you’ll change your mind in the future”) left without the immunization. But when doctors used a combination of acquiescence and persistence (“If you don’t want that, it’s fine with me. But it’s for safety…”), 15 percent of patients took the vaccination. When doctors used persistence alone (“when they get them when they are younger, their immune system builds up a better response”) 94 percent of patients were vaccinated. The latter technique, the researchers found, worked even in the seven visits during which parents expressed very strong initial reluctance: All seven of those kids ended up vaccinated.

“These were really encouraging findings,” says lead researcher Jasmin Tiro, a University of Texas assistant professor of public health who specializes in behavioral science. “These parents went from hesitant to getting the vaccine in the same visit.” The findings echo previous research on providers’ conversations with parents of babies and toddlers about childhood vaccines.

Tiro noted that it’s especially important that providers are able to address fears or worries a patient or parent might have about the shot. That can include addressing misinformation: Earlier this month, for example, the journal Nature retracted a study claiming to show that the HPV vaccine caused neurological damage in mice.

One of the main challenges with the HPV vaccine is that it’s a series of two or three shots, so even if a parent agrees to the first one, there’s no guarantee the child will be back for another. A separate new study, published in the American Journal of Public Health last week, found that completion rates are declining, especially among girls: In 2006, only 38 percent of girls finished the vaccine series, compared with 67 percent in 2014. The study only tracked boys from 2011-2014, but it found a decline there, too: 33 percent of boys had the full series in 2014, versus 36 percent in 2011. Researchers believe that more girls get the shot than boys because parents believe that HPV only causes cervical cancer. (That’s false; it can also cause cancers of the mouth, throat, and penis, among others.)

The researchers identified a number of factors that seemed to influence vaccine completion rates—people who lived in the South and the West were less likely to finish the series, as were people with less robust insurance. Interestingly, they also found that the type of healthcare provider administering the shots seemed to matter as well: Girls who got the first shot from an obstetrician/gynecologist had much higher completion rates than those who got it from a mid-level provider such as a nurse practitioner. Tiro notes that the team’s findings underscore the importance of educating a clinic’s entire staff about how to have these conversations. “You need a consistent message sent by the whole clinic,” she said. “Every single person who interacts with the family needs to be on message.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate