The Kentucky House Majority Leader Wrote a Bill to Cut Teachers’ Pensions. A Teacher Just Beat Him at the Polls.

“They picked on the wrong group.”

Travis Brenda, a teacher at Rockcastle County High School, defeated Jonathan Shell in a state House Republican primary on Tuesday. Wade Payne/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

When Kentucky passed a plan this spring that threatened the pensions of its future educators, thousands of teachers rallied outside the statehouse in Frankfort. They reminded the lawmakers who supported the measure: “We’ll remember in November.”

There are early signs they were serious: On Tuesday night, in his first bid for public office, Kentucky math teacher R. Travis Brenda narrowly ousted one of the bill’s chief architects, Republican House Majority leader Jonathan Shell, in the Republican state House primary. Brenda’s victory emerges following a wave of teacher protests over subpar pay and school funding in mostly Republican-dominated states. 

First elected in 2012, Shell, a 30-year-old farmer, had been viewed as a rising star in Kentucky’s Republican Party. He became House Majority leader in 2017, just after Republicans seized control of the state House for the first time in 95 years. US Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell once called his Kentucky peer “one of the most important Republicans” in the state.   

Then, in March, Shell helped his fellow Republicans craft a pension overhaul bill that, among other changes, eliminated guaranteed retirement benefits for new Kentucky teachers by shifting them into a “hybrid” plan. The legislation, tacked onto a sewage services bill, swiftly passed in the final days of the legislative session without public input.

Though the changes had little effect on current teachers—the bill limited the number of sick days that can go toward retirement benefits—the legislation’s passage and Gov. Matt Bevin’s signature prompted thousands of educators to rally at the statehouse against the new pension plan and call for more school funding. (State attorney general Andy Beshear and the Kentucky Education Association, the state’s teachers union, filed a lawsuit challenging the pension law.) Gov. Bevin came under fire for suggesting that the school closures resulting from the teacher protests endangered kids and led them to be at risk of physical and sexual abuse, though he apologized for the remarks a day later. 

Brenda, who has been teaching for 20 years and is not a member of the state’s teachers union, campaigned against the pension bill, telling the Lousiville Courier Journal that his opponent had lost support from his constituents. Unlike Shell, who, the Courier Journal reported, raised more than $131,000 in campaign contributions, Brenda raised only about $16,000. So when the election results started trickling in on Tuesday, many were surprised when Brenda won. He will now face Democrat Mary Renfro, a real estate agent and school board member, in November’s election.

Lawmakers up for reelection in 2018 are bracing themselves for especially competitive challenges as dozens of current and former educators, hoping to capitalize on frustration against current leadership, have filed for state office. In Kentucky alone, at least 40 current or former educators are vying for seats in the state legislature this year. Of the 20 that had primaries on Tuesday, 12 won, according to NPR. 

Brenda chalked up his victory in part to the support he received from teachers. “They picked on the wrong group,” Brenda told the AP on Tuesday. “Not just the educators but all state employees are rising up, and we’re not going to let things be done to us.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate