Democrats Spend Father’s Day Protesting Trump’s Family Separation Policy

Sen. Ted Cruz’s challenger called the policy “inhumane.”

CNN, "State of the Union"

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Hundreds of people turned out to protest Sunday in the border town of Tornillo, Texas, where on Thursday the Trump administration announced its plans to house immigrant children in a new detention center—derided by critics as a tent city. The US government has separated nearly 2,000 minors from their parents at the border over a six-week period this spring. By Friday, the first tent shelter was up and running, holding about 200 kids, 20 percent of whom had been forcibly separated from their parents.

The news of the planned tent city, as well as Trump’s family separation policy that has helped create demand for the new detention facilities, has prompted widespread outrage—including from Democrats, Republicans, and even evangelical leaders and the Catholic Church

The protest in Tornillo was organized by Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-Texas), who is currently running to unseat Republican Ted Cruz in a bid for the US Senate. (My colleague Tim Murphy profiled the Texas hopeful back in September.) A number of other Democratic candidates from Texas, as well as Rep. Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.), were at the protest, along with hundreds of ordinary people who were drawn to the border by harrowing stories of children being torn from parents who have traveled thousands of miles seeking safety and asylum in the US.

O’Rourke told CNN’s Jake Tapper that the process of taking children from their parents is “inhumane.” He added, “I’d like to say it’s un-American, but it’s happening right now in America. And it’s on all of us, not just the Trump administration.”

 

O’Rourke and Kennedy weren’t the only members of Congress spending the weekend protesting and investigating conditions for migrant families. Another group of New York and New Jersey Democrats, led by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), spent Sunday morning trying to get access to a family detention center in Elizabeth, New Jersey. Center officials initially said they’d call the police on the visitors, but eventually allowed in the delegation.

From the Huffington Post:

Speaking to reporters after the visit, [Rep. Frank] Pallone Jr. said several detainees being held at the facility had been separated from family members, including one whose 7-year-old brother was missing and a father who said that his 5-year-old daughter had been taken from him while he was asleep.

“They came to this country in search of the protection and refuge that the proud inscription on the Statue of Liberty promises to those fleeing terror,” Nadler said. “They are being welcomed by more terror. What could be more terrifying than having your [child] taken from your arms?”

Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley (D) led another group of Democratic lawmakers to the South Texas border near McAllen to tour processing centers run by the Customs and Border Patrol. They planned to investigate the CBP’s practice of referring all immigrants for criminal processing at the border, even if they have valid asylum claims that could legally be made under US law. Earlier this month, Merkley visited another facility in Brownsville, Texas, which holds unaccompanied minors, and was refused entry.


Meanwhile, as the news media and Democrats were focused on the crisis at the border this weekend, Sen. Cruz was spending his time on more athletic pursuits. On Saturday night, Cruz played basketball against late night TV host Jimmy Kimmel, a match up Cruz had been tweeting about for days in advance and exchanging taunts with Kimmel over Twitter:

The contrast between O’Rourke and Cruz wasn’t lost on the Texas House Democratic Caucus:


Cruz defeated Kimmel 11-9 in the “Blobfish Basketball Classic” in Houston, but Kimmel apparently managed to get a dig at Cruz on the court, asking, “Did you spend more time this week practicing basketball than trying to get those kids out of that detention center?”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate