Does Your State Let Parents Refuse Vaccines for “Philosophical Reasons”?

“I have no clue what the hell is going on in Idaho.”

Jovanmandic/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The scientific evidence in favor of vaccines is solid. But many parents don’t immunize their children, citing religious or “philosophical beliefs.” In many states, it’s easy for parents to opt-out of school-mandated vaccinations for kids—which leaves pockets of the population unvaccinated, and puts children at risk of otherwise-preventable infectious outbreaks, like measles, whooping cough, and HPV.

Without the vast majority of a population vaccinated against diseases, or “herd immunity,” unvaccinated children become more likely to spread diseases to infants or people with weak immune systems.

While some states have cracked down on nonmedical exemptions, 18 states still allow parents not to vaccinate their children on the basis of philosophical beliefs. One of those beliefs is the thoroughly-debunked myth that vaccines cause autism—which has caused an untold number of parents in the US to avoid vaccines. (The states where nonmedical exemptions are permitted include Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin.)

Between 2009 and 2016, researchers documented an increase in the number of kids enrolling in kindergarten with non-medical exemptions in 12 of the 18 states with belief exemptions. The group, from Baylor University, Baylor College of Medicine, Rice University, and Texas A&M, also identified several metropolitan “hotspots” where vaccine exemptions pose the biggest risk to children: Seattle, Portland, Houston, Phoenix, Detroit, and Kansas City stood out in the data set for their high exemption numbers. The results published Tuesday in the journal PLOS Medicine.

County-level non-medical exemption rates, 2016-2017

PLOS

Counties with >400 kindergarteners with non-medical exemptions, 2016-2017

PLOS

Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine and an author on the study, noted that the problem is especially acute in Idaho. In the small city of Camas, Idaho, for example, about 27 percent of kindergartners entered school with a non-medical exemption in 2016, the highest in the country, the study found. In Bonner, Idaho, it was about 20 percent. In Boise, 16 percent. In fact, Idaho is home to eight of the ten counties in the United States with the highest rates of unvaccinated kindergartners. 

“I have no clue what the hell is going on in Idaho,” Hotez says. “It’s pretty stark.”

Hotez said he plans to conduct future research on why certain counties, including those in Idaho, may have such high exemption rates. One possible explanation is anti-vaccine campaigning. “Our findings indicate that new foci of anti-vaccine activities are being established in major metropolitan areas, rendering select cities vulnerable for vaccination-preventable diseases,” the authors write

In states where nonmedical exemptions are not allowed, research shows that vaccination rates are higher, meaning communities are at less risk of an outbreak. In this study, researchers showed a related statistic to be true: states that allowed nonmedical exemptions did in fact have lower kindergarten vaccine coverage.  

Himself the father of a child with autism, Hotez believes that scientists are partially to blame for the rise of anti-vaccine pseudo-science. “As a scientific profession, we’ve been very inward-looking,” he says. “We’re so fixed on our grants and papers that we don’t think about engaging the public.” 

Hotez hopes his research will inform discussions about vaccines and help eliminate disinformation spread by anti-vaccine lobbyists. “This is not a time to be complacent,” he says. “We need to push back against some of these anti-vaccine movements in the United States.” 

This post has been updated to reflect that the study’s authors are affiliated with Baylor University, as well as the Baylor College of Medicine, an independent institution.

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate